Exploring Sectoral Reach in Age-Friendly Communities

Author:

Black Kathy1,Oh Patricia2

Affiliation:

1. School of Aging Studies, College of Behavioral and Community Sciences, University of South Florida , Sarasota, Florida , USA

2. University of Maine, Center on Aging , Bangor, Maine , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives There is growing interest in better understanding the sectoral reach of age-friendly community practice. Action across a wide range of actors is central to achieving age-friendly societal change, according to the World Health Organization and required for governmental participation in its Global Network of Age-Friendly Cities and Communities. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the scope of sectoral reach by age-friendly communities. Research Design and Methods We used qualitative inquiry to assess sectoral efforts reported by American age-friendly communities that completed a 5-year cycle of participation (n = 40). We employed directed content analysis using a priori indicators by sectoral actors: public (i.e., government), private (i.e., business), and civil society, including nonprofit organizations and volunteers. We classify sectoral actions by type (i.e., intersectoral and multisectoral) and by clustered domain community foci (i.e., built, social, and service). Results Our study identifies the extent and types of sectoral actors and actions reported by age-friendly communities with the greatest efforts reported in the public sector, and while similarly distributed across all the domains, slightly more efforts were noted in the built environment. We also found greater intersectoral efforts (i.e., explicitly working toward shared goals) than multisectoral (i.e., not necessarily in collaboration on shared goals), particularly across government. Discussion and Implications While our study substantiates the breadth of actions toward age-friendly change, additional research is needed to examine the ways in which the public and other sectoral actions are further linked to outcomes in communities in the United States and in other countries.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,General Medicine

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3