A Systematic Review of Quality Dementia Clinical Guidelines for the Development of WHO’s Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation

Author:

Jeon Yun-Hee1ORCID,Krein Luisa1ORCID,O’Connor Claire M C23ORCID,Mowszowski Loren4ORCID,Duffy Shantel5ORCID,Seeher Katrin6ORCID,Rauch Alexandra7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney , Sydney , Australia

2. Centre for Positive Ageing, HammondCare , Sydney , Australia

3. School of Population Health, University of New South Wales , Sydney , Australia

4. Brain and Mind Centre & School of Psychology, The University of Sydney , Sydney , Australia

5. School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney , Sydney , Australia

6. Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization , Geneva , Switzerland

7. Rehabilitation Programme, World Health Organization , Geneva , Switzerland

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives As part of the WHO Rehabilitation 2030 call for action, the WHO Rehabilitation Programme is developing its Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation (PIR) to support ministries of health around the globe in integrating rehabilitation services into health systems. As a vital step for this PIR development, we conducted a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for dementia to identify interventions for rehabilitation and related evidence. Research Design and Methods Following WHO Rehabilitation Programme and Cochrane Rehabilitation’s methodology, quality CPGs published in English between January 2010 and March 2020 were identified using PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PEDro, Google Scholar, guideline databases, and professional society websites. Guideline quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (II). Results Of the 22 CPGs that met the selection criteria, 6 satisfied the quality evaluation. Three hundred and thirty rehabilitation-related recommendations were identified, mostly concentrated in the areas of cognition, emotion, and carer support. There were many strong interventions, with moderate- to high-quality evidence that could be easily introduced in routine practice. However, major limitations were found both in the quality of evidence and scope, especially in areas such as education and vocation, community and social life, and lifestyle modifications. Discussion and Implications Further rigorous research is needed to build quality evidence in dementia rehabilitation in general, and especially in neglected areas for rehabilitation. Future work should also focus on the development of CPGs for dementia rehabilitation. A multipronged approach is needed to achieve Universal Health Coverage for dementia rehabilitation.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,General Medicine

Reference62 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3