Not Too Old for TikTok: How Older Adults Are Reframing Aging

Author:

Ng Reuben12ORCID,Indran Nicole1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore , Singapore , Singapore

2. Lloyd’s Register Foundation Institute for the Public Understanding of Risk, National University of Singapore , Singapore , Singapore

Abstract

AbstractBackground and ObjectivesAlthough reputed for being the virtual playground of teenagers, TikTok has since made its way to older adults, some of whom have become content creators with millions of followers. Despite their immense sway over audiences, as well as their potential to reconfigure socially constructed notions of aging, these older TikTok personalities have been given scant attention in gerontological literature. We fill this gap by exploring how older adults use TikTok to engage in discourses on old age.Research Design and MethodsWe compiled the most viewed videos of users aged 60 and older with at least 100,000 followers, generating 1,382 videos with over 3.5 billion views. Videos that did not feature older adults engaging in discourses on aging were excluded, resulting in 348 videos for content analysis. Both inductive and deductive approaches guided the qualitative analysis.ResultsThree themes emerged: Nearly 3 in 4 videos featured older adults “Defying Age Stereotypes” (71%; Theme 1), 18% featured them “Making Light of Age-Related Vulnerabilities” (Theme 2), and 11% involved older adults “Calling out Ageism” (Theme 3).Discussion and ImplicationsThis is the first known study exploring how older adults consciously engage in discourses of aging through their participation on TikTok. Our findings highlight the potential for older adults to be put at the vanguard of a movement aimed at challenging socially constructed notions of old age.

Funder

Social Science Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,General Medicine

Reference80 articles.

1. Inductive and deductive: Ambiguous labels in qualitative content analysis;Armat;The Qualitative Report,2018

2. Technology to reduce social isolation and loneliness;Baecker;Proceedings of the 16th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility,2014

3. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis;Bengtsson;NursingPlus Open,2016

4. Valuing old age without leveraging ableism;Berridge;Generations,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3