Strategies to Improve Emergency Transitions From Long-Term Care Facilities: A Scoping Review

Author:

Tate Kaitlyn1ORCID,Cummings Greta1,Jacobsen Frode2,Halas Gayle3ORCID,Van den Bergh Graziella4,Devkota Rashmi1,Shrestha Shovana1,Doupe Malcolm5

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta , Edmonton, Alberta , Canada

2. Centre for Care Research, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences , Bergen, Vestland , Norway

3. School of Dental Hygiene, University of Manitoba , Winnipeg, Manitoba , Canada

4. Department of Health and Functioning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences , Bergen, Vestland , Norway

5. Rady Faculty Medicine, University of Manitoba , Winnipeg, Manitoba , Canada

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives Older adults residing in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) often experience substandard transitions to emergency departments (EDs) through rationed and delayed ED care. We aimed to identify research describing interventions to improve transitions from RACFs to EDs. Research Design and Methods In our scoping review, we included English language articles that (a) examined an intervention to improve transitions from RACF to EDs; and (b) focused on older adults (≥65 years). We employed content analysis. Dy et al.’s Care Transitions Framework was used to assess the contextualization of interventions and measurement of implementation success. Results Interventions in 28 studies included geriatric assessment or outreach services (n = 7), standardized documentation forms (n = 6), models of care to improve transitions from RACFs to EDs (n = 6), telehealth services (n = 3), nurse-led care coordination programs (n = 2), acute-care geriatric departments (n = 2), an extended paramedicine program (n = 1), and a web-based referral system (n = 1). Many studies (n = 17) did not define what “improvement” entailed and instead assessed documentation strategies and distal outcomes (e.g., hospital admission rates, length of stay). Few authors reported how they contextualized interventions to align with care environments and/or evaluated implementation success. Few studies included clinician perspectives and no study examined resident- or family/friend caregiver-reported outcomes. Discussion and Implications Mixed or nonsignificant results prevent us from recommending (or discouraging) any interventions. Given the complexity of these transitions and the need to create sustainable improvement strategies, future research should describe strategies used to embed innovations in care contexts and to measure both implementation and intervention success.

Funder

Norges Forskningsråd

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference74 articles.

1. Burdensome transitions at the end of life among long-term care residents with dementia;Aaltonen;Journal of the American Medical Directors Association,2014

2. Crossing boundaries: Establishing a framework for researching quality and safety in care transitions;Aase;Applied Ergonomics,2020

3. Rationing of health care services to the elderly in the opinion of staff hospital emergency departments;Adamczyk;Journal of Education, Health and Sport,2018

4. Hospitalization of nursing home residents in an acute-care geriatric department: Direct versus emergency room admission;Aizen;Israel Medical Association Journal,2001

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3