A Scoping Review of the Conceptual Differentiation of Technology for Healthy Aging

Author:

Kim Hansuk12,Kelly Sarah13,Lafortune Louise1,Brayne Carol1

Affiliation:

1. Cambridge Institute of Public Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

2. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Sejong, Republic of Korea

3. THIS Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives With the emergence of healthy aging as a key societal issue in recent decades, technology has often been proposed as a solution to the challenges faced by aging societies. From a public health perspective, however, aging-related technologies have been inconsistently conceptualized and ill-defined. By examining how relevant concepts in “technology for aging” have been developed to date, we hope to identify gaps and begin clarifying the topic. Research Design and Methods We conducted a scoping review according to PRISMA-ScR, drawing on PubMed and Embase. We selected articles that directly reported concepts of technology for aging, or from which such concepts could be inferred. Results We identified 43 articles, most of which were narrative reviews (n = 31). Concepts of technology for aging were presented in diverse ways with some overlap. Most studies provided some terminology (n = 36), but with little conceptual uniformity. Conceptual discourse was often focused on the aging agenda; while technological aspects were poorly defined. A conceptual framework from a public health perspective was derived from 8 articles—it showed that technology strategies do not take a population approach. Discussion and Implications While the potential of “technology for aging” is vast, its real capacity to deliver a desirable life for older people remains underdeveloped. Clearer concepts and realistic goals at population level are lacking. Efficient investment must be made throughout the social system, and technology needs to be integrated via macro-level practices.

Funder

Medical Research Council, UK

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,General Medicine

Reference58 articles.

1. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework;Arksey;International Journal of Social Research Methodology,,2005

2. Technology, older persons’ perspectives and the anthropological ethnographic lens;Bailey;Alter,,2009

3. Towards a comprehensive public health response to population ageing;Beard;Lancet,,2015

4. Aging in place: A life course perspective;Benefield;The Nursing Clinics of North America,,2014

5. Ambient assisted living technologies for aging well: A scoping review;Blackman;Journal of Intelligent Systems,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3