Positive Aging and Death or Dying: A Scoping Review

Author:

Otto Robin Brown1,Fields Noelle L1ORCID,Bennett Michael1,Anderson Keith A2

Affiliation:

1. School of Social Work, University of Texas at Arlington , Arlington, Texas , USA

2. Department of Social Work, University of Mississippi , Oxford, Mississippi , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives This scoping review aims to examine the extent and the manner in which research that utilizes successful, active, productive, and healthy aging framework(s) includes death or dying. Research Design and Methods An examination of peer-reviewed academic journal articles was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute’s methodological standards for scoping reviews and conforming to Arskey and O’Malley’s 5-stage framework. The initial search resulted in 1,759 articles for review, and following the rigorous screening, 35 studies were included for the final review. A qualitative thematic analysis was used to identify how research utilizes the concepts of death and dying in the context of 4 positive aging models. Results The core themes identified include (a) the absence of death and dying dimensions in positive aging models; (b) older adults’ outlooks on death and dying while aging well; (c) religious and spiritual dimensions of aging well; (d) negative consequences of positive aging models without death and dying dimensions; and (e) the future of death and dying in positive aging models. Discussion and Implications The review delivers a critique by researchers on the noticeable absence of death and dying processes within the framework of successful, active, productive, and healthy aging models. These findings represent a rich opportunity for future research on these concepts.

Funder

Roy E. Dulak Professorship for Community Practice Research

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,General Medicine

Reference85 articles.

1. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework;Arksey;International Journal of Social Research Methodology,2005

2. 7 billion and counting;Bloom;Science,2011

3. Thematic analysis;Braun,2012

4. Palliative care in Dutch hospitals: A rapid increase in the number of expert teams, a limited number of referrals;Brinkman-Stoppelenburg;BMC Health Services Research,2016

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Valuing Aging Services and the People Who Work in Them;The Gerontologist;2023-10-17

2. A Jarring Question to Help Unravel What Really Matters;Journal of Gerontological Nursing;2023-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3