Adapting Strategies for Optimal Intervention Implementation in Nursing Homes: A Formative Evaluation

Author:

Pimentel Camilla B123ORCID,Mills Whitney L45,Snow Andrea Lynn678,Palmer Jennifer A9,Sullivan Jennifer L910ORCID,Wewiorski Nancy J1,Hartmann Christine W111

Affiliation:

1. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research and the New England Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, Massachusetts

2. New England Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, Massachusetts

3. Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts

4. Center for Innovation in Long-Term Services and Supports, Providence VA Medical Center, Rhode Island

5. Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island

6. Tuscaloosa Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tuscaloosa, Alabama

7. Alabama Research Institute on Aging and Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama

8. Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa

9. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Massachusetts

10. Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, Massachusetts

11. Department of Public Health, University of Massachusetts Lowell

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives Nursing homes pose unique challenges for implementation of research and quality improvement (QI). We previously demonstrated successful implementation of a nursing home-led intervention to improve relationships between frontline staff and residents in 6 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Community Living Centers (CLCs). This article discusses early adaptations made to the intervention and its implementation to enhance frontline staff participation. Research Design and Methods This is a formative evaluation of intervention implementation at the first 2 participating CLCs. Formative evidence—including site visitors’ field notes, implementation facilitation records, and semistructured frontline staff interviews—were collected throughout the study period. Data analysis was informed by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behavior model of behavior change. Results Adaptations were made to 5 a priori intervention implementation strategies: (a) training leaders, (b) training frontline staff, (c) adapting the intervention to meet local needs, (d) auditing and providing feedback, and (e) implementation facilitation. On the basis of a 6-month implementation period at the first CLC, we identified elements of the intervention and aspects of the implementation strategies that could be adapted to facilitate frontline staff participation at the second CLC. Discussion and Implications Incremental implementation, paired with ongoing formative evaluation, proved critical to enhancing capability, opportunity, and motivation among frontline staff. In elucidating what was required to initiate and sustain the nursing home-led intervention, we provide a blueprint for responding to emergent challenges when performing research and QI in the nursing home setting.

Funder

Department of Veterans Affairs

Veterans Health Administration

Office of Research and Development

Health Services Research and Development

Rehabilitation Research and Development

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,General Medicine

Reference31 articles.

1. EHR? Assess readiness first;Amatayakul;Healthcare Financial Management,,2005

2. Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge;Argote;Organizational Science,,2011

3. Systematic review and meta-analysis of practice facilitation within primary care settings;Baskerville;Annals of Family Medicine,2012

4. Quality improvement implementation in the nursing home;Berlowitz;Health Services Research,2003

5. Flexibility and structure may enhance implementation of family-focused therapy in community mental health settings;Chung;Community Mental Health Journal,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3