Lack of controlled studies on snakebite prevention: a rapid review

Author:

Rodrigo Chaturaka1ORCID,Gnanathasan Ariaranee2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pathology, School of Biomedical Sciences, UNSW , Sydney, NSW 2052 , Australia

2. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo , 25 Kynsey Road, Colombo 00800 , Sri Lanka

Abstract

Abstract Globally, snakebites cause an estimated 80 000–140 000 deaths annually. While there are evidence-based recommendations for managing snakebite victims, recommendations on the prevention of snakebites are limited to expert opinions. We conducted a rapid review to summarise evidence from human studies with a control group on preventing snakebites. Searching PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL and EMBASE with inclusive search terms without language or time limits only yielded three eligible studies (one case control study and two prospective controlled clinical studies), highlighting a knowledge gap. Two studies in Nepal by the same group showed that health education of stakeholders and sleeping under a bednet can significantly reduce snakebite incidence (p<0.05), but these observations are not confirmed elsewhere, and because of the high risk of bias the certainty of evidence was low. The third study from Sri Lanka, which assessed if sleeping above ground would prevent snakebites, had inconclusive results. This demonstrates an urgent need for studies with a control group to guide evidence-based recommendations for snakebite prevention. Potential interventions tested can range from low-cost measures such as wearing appropriate footwear in resource-limited settings to testing the efficacy of chemical, biological (e.g. rodent control) or device-based methods and community-supported platforms tracking snakebite sightings with real-time geolocation data in highly resourced settings.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine,Parasitology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3