Pollinator response to livestock grazing: implications for rangeland conservation in sagebrush ecosystems

Author:

Goosey Hayes B1ORCID,Blanchette Gabrielle E2,Naugle David E3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University , Bozeman, MT , USA

2. SWCA Environmental Consultants , Salt Lake City, UT , USA

3. Wildlife Biology Program, University of Montana , Missoula, MT , USA

Abstract

Abstract World food supplies rely on pollination, making this plant–animal relationship a highly valued ecosystem service. Bees pollinate flowering plants in rangelands that constitute up to half of global terrestrial vegetation. Livestock grazing is the most widespread rangeland use and can affect insect pollinators through herbivory. We examined management effects on bee abundance and other insect pollinators on grazed and idle sagebrush rangelands in central Montana, USA. From 2016 to 2018, we sampled pollinators on lands enrolled in rest-rotation grazing, unenrolled grazing lands, and geographically separate idle lands without grazing for over a decade. Bare ground covered twice as much area (15% vs. 7) with half the litter (12% vs. 24) on grazed than idle regardless of enrollment. Bee pollinators were 2–3 times more prevalent in grazed than idle in 2016–2017. In 2018, bees were similar among grazed and idled during an unseasonably wet and cool summer that depressed pollinator catches; captures of secondary pollinators was similar among treatments 2 of 3 study years. Ground-nesting bees (94.6% of total bee abundance) were driven by periodic grazing that maintained bare ground and kept litter accumulations in check. In contrast, idle provided fewer nesting opportunities for bees that were mostly solitary, ground-nesting genera requiring unvegetated spaces for reproduction. Managed lands supported higher bee abundance that evolved with bison grazing on the eastern edge of the sagebrush ecosystem. Our findings suggest that periodic disturbance may enhance pollinator habitat, and that rangelands may benefit from periodic grazing by livestock.

Funder

USDA Conservation Effects Assessment Project-Wildlife Component

United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference89 articles.

1. Nest switching and guarding by the communal sweat bee Agapostemon virescens (Hymenoptera, Halictidae);Abrams;Ins. Soc,1981

2. Assessing the impacts of livestock production on biodiversity in rangeland ecosystems;Alkemade;Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A,2013

3. Valuing insect pollination services with cost of replacement;Allsopp;PLoS One,2008

4. Cows not Plows: using cropland conversion risk to scale-up averted loss of core sagebrush rangelands;Bedrosian;Rangel. Ecol. Manage,2024

5. Rangeland management for pollinators;Black;Rangelands,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3