Breaking botnets: A quantitative analysis of individual, technical, isolationist, and multilateral approaches to cybersecurity

Author:

Haner Justin K1ORCID,Knake Robert K23

Affiliation:

1. Department of Political Science, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

2. The Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

3. The Council on Foreign Relations, New York, NY, USA

Abstract

Abstract Malicious networks of botnets continue to grow in strength as millions of new users and devices connect to the internet each day, many becoming unsuspectingly complicit in cyber-attacks or unwitting accomplices to cybercrimes. Both states and nonstate actors use botnets to surreptitiously control the combined computing power of infected devices to engage in espionage, hacking, and to carry out distributed denial of service attacks to disable internet-connected targets from businesses and banks to power grids and electronic voting systems. Although cybersecurity professionals have established a variety of best practices to fight botnets, many important questions remain concerning why levels of botnet infections differ sharply from country to country, as relatively little empirical testing has been done to establish which policies and approaches to cybersecurity are actually the most effective. Using newly available time-series data on botnets, this article outlines and tests the conventionally held beliefs and cybersecurity strategies at every level—individual, technical, isolationist, and multilateral. This study finds that wealthier countries are more vulnerable than less wealthy countries; that technical solutions, including patching software, preventing spoofing, and securing servers, consistently outperform attempts to educate citizens about cybersecurity; and that countries which favor digital isolation and restrictions on internet freedom are not actually better protected than those who embrace digital freedom and multilateral approaches to cybersecurity. This latter finding is of particular importance as China’s attempts to fundamentally reshape the internet via the “Digital Silk Road” component of the Belt and Road Initiative will actually end up making both China and the world less secure. Due to the interconnected nature of threats in cyberspace, states should instead embrace multilateral, technical solutions to better govern this global common and increase cybersecurity around the world.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Law,Computer Networks and Communications,Political Science and International Relations,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,Social Psychology,Computer Science (miscellaneous)

Reference103 articles.

1. Cyber Warfare: A Review of Theories, Law, Policies, Actual Incidents – and the Dilemma of Anonymity;Reich;European Journal of Law and Technology,2010

2. Bring the State Back In: Conflict and Cooperation among States in Cybersecurity;Cho;Pacific Focus,2017

3. A Survey of Defense Mechanisms against Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Flooding Attacks;Zargar;IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials,2013

4. An Overview of Modern Botnets;Negash;Inf Secur J,2015

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Drafting a Cybersecurity Standard for Outer Space Missions: On Critical Infrastructure, China, and the Indispensability of a Global Inclusive Approach;Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs;2024-09

2. Effective Bot Management Strategies for Web Applications;2024 International Symposium on Intelligent Robotics and Systems (ISoIRS);2024-06-14

3. Unravelling the three lines model in cybersecurity: a systematic literature review;Computers & Security;2024-04

4. Opportunities and Challenges of Digital Audits and Compliance;Advances in Finance, Accounting, and Economics;2024-03-29

5. Supply Chain Resilience, Industry 4.0, and Investment Interplays: A Review;Production & Manufacturing Research;2023-07-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3