Tell me more, tell me more: repeated personal data requests increase disclosure

Author:

Fleming Piers1ORCID,Edwards S Gareth2,Bayliss Andrew P1ORCID,Seger Charles R1

Affiliation:

1. School of Psychology, Centre for Behavioural and Economic Social Science, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park , Norwich, NR4 7TJ , UK

2. School of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park , Norwich, NR4 7TJ , UK

Abstract

Abstract Personal data is of great commercial benefit and potential sensitivity. However, for the consumers who provide their personal data, doing so comes with potential costs, benefits and security risks. Typically, consumers have the option to consent to the use of personal/sensitive data but existing research suggests consumer choices may only be weakly related to their concerns (the privacy paradox). Here, we examine if the repetitive nature of data requests alters behaviour but not concern, therefore, explaining the divergence. This work is theoretically grounded in ‘Foot in the door’ research in which small initial requests facilitate subsequent larger requests. An initial laboratory study asking for real, personal data demonstrated increased information disclosure at a subsequent request. A second online study replicated the increased information disclosure effect and found no change in associated privacy concern. We find this supports foot-in-the-door as one explanation of the privacy paradox. We suggest ways for businesses and consumers to encourage an acceptable level of disclosure to match personal beliefs for mutual trust and benefit.

Funder

Centre for Copyright and New Business Models in the Creative Economy

University of East Anglia

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Law,Computer Networks and Communications,Political Science and International Relations,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,Social Psychology,Computer Science (miscellaneous)

Reference63 articles.

1. The world’s most valuable resource is no longer oil, but data;The Economist,2017

2. Compensatory responses to crowding: effects of personal space intrusion and privacy reduction;Greenberg;J Pers Soc Psychol,1977

3. Facebook: threats to privacy;Jones;Proj MAC MIT Proj Math Comput,2005

4. Valuing information security from a phishing attack;Nguyen;J Cybersecur,2017

5. The privacy paradox: personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors;Norberg;J Consum Aff,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3