Identifying clinically applicable machine learning algorithms for glioma segmentation: recent advances and discoveries

Author:

Tillmanns Niklas12ORCID,Lum Avery E1,Cassinelli Gabriel1,Merkaj Sara1,Verma Tej1,Zeevi Tal1,Staib Lawrence1,Subramanian Harry1,Bahar Ryan C1,Brim Waverly1,Lost Jan1,Jekel Leon1,Brackett Alexandria3,Payabvash Sam1,Ikuta Ichiro1,Lin MingDe14,Bousabarah Khaled5,Johnson Michele H1,Cui Jin6,Malhotra Ajay1ORCID,Omuro Antonio7,Turowski Bernd2,Aboian Mariam S1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Brain Tumor Research Group, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, Connecticut , USA

2. University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology , Dusseldorf , Germany

3. Harvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library, Yale University , New Haven, Connecticut , USA

4. Visage Imaging, Inc. , San Diego, California , USA

5. Visage Imaging, GmbH , Berlin , Germany

6. Department of Pathology, Boston Children’s Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts , USA

7. Department of Neurology and Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, Connecticut , USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundWhile there are innumerable machine learning (ML) research algorithms used for segmentation of gliomas, there is yet to be a US FDA cleared product. The aim of this study is to explore the systemic limitations of research algorithms that have prevented translation from concept to product by a review of the current research literature.MethodsWe performed a systematic literature review on 4 databases. Of 11 727 articles, 58 articles met the inclusion criteria and were used for data extraction and screening using TRIPOD.ResultsWe found that while many articles were published on ML-based glioma segmentation and report high accuracy results, there were substantial limitations in the methods and results portions of the papers that result in difficulty reproducing the methods and translation into clinical practice.ConclusionsIn addition, we identified that more than a third of the articles used the same publicly available BRaTS and TCIA datasets and are responsible for the majority of patient data on which ML algorithms were trained, which leads to limited generalizability and potential for overfitting and bias.

Funder

Biomedical Education Program

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

National Institutes of Health

American Society of Neuroradiology

National Center for Advancing Translational Science

Medical Research Foundation

Doris Duke Charitable Foundation

NVIDIA

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery,Oncology,Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3