Repeatability of tumor perfusion kinetics from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in glioblastoma

Author:

Woodall Ryan T1ORCID,Sahoo Prativa1,Cui Yujie2,Chen Bihong T3,Shiroishi Mark S4,Lavini Cristina5,Frankel Paul2,Gutova Margarita6,Brown Christine E78,Munson Jennifer M9,Rockne Russell C1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Mathematical Oncology, Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA

2. Division of Biostatistics, Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA

3. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA

4. Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

5. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

6. Department of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA

7. Department of Hematology & Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA

8. Department of Immuno-Oncology, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA

9. Department of Biomedical Engineering & Mechanics, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, Virginia, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) parameters have been shown to be biomarkers for treatment response in glioblastoma (GBM). However, variations in analysis and measurement methodology complicate determination of biological changes measured via DCE. The aim of this study is to quantify DCE-MRI variations attributable to analysis methodology and image quality in GBM patients. Methods The Extended Tofts model (eTM) and Leaky Tracer Kinetic Model (LTKM), with manually and automatically segmented vascular input functions (VIFs), were used to calculate perfusion kinetic parameters from 29 GBM patients with double-baseline DCE-MRI data. DCE-MRI images were acquired 2–5 days apart with no change in treatment. Repeatability of kinetic parameters was quantified with Bland–Altman and percent repeatability coefficient (%RC) analysis. Results The perfusion parameter with the least RC was the plasma volume fraction (vp), with a %RC of 53%. The extra-cellular extra-vascular volume fraction (ve) %RC was 82% and 81%, for extended Tofts-Kety Model (eTM) and LTKM respectively. The %RC of the volume transfer rate constant (Ktrans) was 72% for the eTM, and 82% for the LTKM, respectively. Using an automatic VIF resulted in smaller %RCs for all model parameters, as compared to manual VIF. Conclusions As much as 72% change in Ktrans (eTM, autoVIF) can be attributable to non-biological changes in the 2–5 days between double-baseline imaging. Poor Ktrans repeatability may result from inferior temporal resolution and short image acquisition time. This variation suggests DCE-MRI repeatability studies should be performed institutionally, using an automatic VIF method and following quantitative imaging biomarkers alliance guidelines.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Building and Construction

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3