Diagnostic accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid liquid biopsy and MRI for leptomeningeal metastases in solid cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Nakasu Yoko12ORCID,Deguchi Shoichi1ORCID,Nakasu Satoshi3ORCID,Yamazaki Mutsumi4,Notsu Akifumi5,Mitsuya Koichi1ORCID,Hayashi Nakamasa1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center , Shizuoka , Japan

2. Department of Neurosurgery, Shiga University of Medical Science , Shiga , Japan

3. Division of Neurosurgery, Omi Medical Center , Shiga , Japan

4. Medical Library, Shizuoka Cancer Center , Shizuoka , Japan

5. Clinical Research Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center , Shizuoka , Japan

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology remains the gold standard approach for diagnosing of leptomeningeal metastases (LM), but has clinical problems due to its low sensitivity. This systemic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the novel CSF biomarkers of liquid biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting LM in patients with solid cancers.MethodsA systematic search of electronic databases was conducted to identify all published diagnostic accuracy studies on CSF liquid biopsies and MRI since January 2000 with registration for PROSPERO (#CRD42022301988). Articles were selected based on pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria following the PRISMA 2020 statement.ResultsThe search yielded 3790 citations, and 10 studies with 668 patients were included in the final analysis. The pooled prevalence of LM was 50.9% (340/668). The respective sensitivity and specificity for index tests were as follows: circulating tumor cells (CTC), 87.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 77.9–92.6%) and 93.8% (86.9–97.2%); cell-free tumor DNA, 97.9% (19.3–100%) and 89.0% (25.3–99.5%); MRI 59.4% (60.7–76.9%) and 97.6% (77.3–99.8%); cytology, 71.9% (54.7–82.9%) and 100%. The diagnostic odds ratio was 100.6 (29.38–344.09) for CTC and 93.3 (88.42–1034.05) for MRI.ConclusionNovel CSF liquid biopsies and MRI may offer improved diagnostic accuracy for LM from solid cancers; however, further research is required to specify the threshold values and to construct standards for individual primary cancers.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery,Oncology,Neurology (clinical)

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3