Carbon dioxide dynamics in an agricultural headwater stream driven by hydrology and primary production
-
Published:2020-05-08
Issue:9
Volume:17
Page:2487-2498
-
ISSN:1726-4189
-
Container-title:Biogeosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biogeosciences
Author:
Wallin Marcus B.ORCID, Audet JoachimORCID, Peacock Mike, Sahlée Erik, Winterdahl MattiasORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Headwater streams are known to be hotspots for carbon dioxide
(CO2) emissions to the atmosphere and are hence important components in
landscape carbon balances. However, surprisingly little is known about
stream CO2 dynamics and emissions in agricultural settings, a land use
type that globally covers ca. 40 % of the continental area. Here we present
hourly measured in situ stream CO2 concentration data from a 11.3 km2 temperate agricultural headwater catchment covering more than 1
year (in total 339 d excluding periods of ice and snow cover). The stream
CO2 concentrations during the entire study period were generally high
(median 3.44 mg C L−1, corresponding to partial pressures (pCO2) of
4778 µatm) but were also highly variable (IQR = 3.26 mg C L−1). The CO2 concentration dynamics covered a variety of
different timescales from seasonal to hourly, with an interplay of
hydrological and biological controls. The hydrological control was strong
(although with both positive and negative influences dependent on
season), and CO2 concentrations changed rapidly in response to rainfall
and snowmelt events. However, during growing-season base flow and receding
flow conditions, aquatic primary production seemed to control the stream
CO2 dynamics, resulting in elevated diel patterns. During the dry summer
period, rapid rewetting following precipitation events generated high
CO2 pulses exceeding the overall median level of stream CO2 (up
to 3 times higher) observed during the whole study period. This finding
highlights the importance of stream intermittency and its effect on stream
CO2 dynamics. Given the observed high levels of CO2 and its
temporally variable nature, agricultural streams clearly need more attention
in order to understand and incorporate these considerable dynamics in large-scale extrapolations.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference52 articles.
1. Alberts, J. M., Beaulieu, J. J., and Buffam, I.: Watershed land use and
seasonal variation constrain the influence of riparian canopy cover on
stream ecosystem metabolism, Ecosystems, 20, 553–567,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-0040-9, 2017. 2. Audet, J., Bastviken, D., Bundschuh, M., Buffam, I., Feckler, A.,
Klemedtsson, L., Laudon, H., Löfgren, S., Natchimuthu, S., Öquist,
M., Peacock, M., and Wallin, M. B.: Forest streams are important sources for
nitrous oxide emissions, Glob. Change Biol., 26, 629–641,
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14812, 2020. 3. Bastviken, D., Sundgren, I., Natchimuthu, S., Reyier, H., and Gålfalk, M.: Technical Note: Cost-efficient approaches to measure carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes and concentrations in terrestrial and aquatic environments using mini loggers, Biogeosciences, 12, 3849-3859. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3849-2015, 2015. 4. Berggren, M., Laudon, H., and Jansson, M.: Hydrological control of organic
carbon support for bacterial growth in boreal headwater streams, Microb.
Ecol., 57, 170–178, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-008-9423-6, 2009. 5. Bodmer, P., Heinz, M., Pusch, M., Singer, G., and Premke, K.: Carbon
dynamics and their link to dissolved organic matter quality across
contrasting stream ecosystems, Sci. Total Environ., 553,
574–586, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.095, 2016.
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|