How is Baseflow Index (BFI) impacted by water resource management practices?
-
Published:2021-10-05
Issue:10
Volume:25
Page:5355-5379
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Bloomfield John P.ORCID, Gong MengyiORCID, Marchant Benjamin P., Coxon GemmaORCID, Addor NansORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Water resource management (WRM) practices, such as groundwater and surface water abstractions and effluent discharges, may impact baseflow. Here the CAMELS-GB large-sample hydrology dataset is used to assess the impacts of such practices on Baseflow Index (BFI) using statistical models of 429 catchments from Great Britain. Two complementary modelling schemes, multiple linear regression (LR) and machine learning (random forests, RF), are used to investigate the relationship between BFI and two sets of covariates (natural covariates only and a combined set of natural and WRM covariates). The LR and RF models show good agreement between explanatory covariates. In all models, the extent of fractured aquifers, clay soils, non-aquifers, and crop cover in catchments, catchment topography, and aridity are significant or important natural covariates in explaining BFI. When WRM terms are included, groundwater abstraction is significant or the most important WRM covariate in both modelling schemes, and effluent discharge to rivers is also identified as significant or influential, although natural covariates still provide the main explanatory power of the models. Surface water abstraction is a significant covariate in the LR model but of only minor importance in the RF model. Reservoir storage
covariates are not significant or are unimportant in both the LR and RF
models for this large-sample analysis. Inclusion of WRM terms improves the
performance of some models in specific catchments. The LR models of high BFI catchments with relatively high levels of groundwater abstraction show the greatest improvements, and there is some evidence of improvement in LR
models of catchments with moderate to high effluent discharges. However,
there is no evidence that the inclusion of the WRM covariates improves the
performance of LR models for catchments with high surface water abstraction
or that they improve the performance of the RF models. These observations
are discussed within a conceptual framework for baseflow generation that
incorporates WRM practices. A wide range of schemes and measures are used to manage water resources in the UK. These include conjunctive-use and low-flow alleviation schemes and hands-off flow measures. Systematic information on such schemes is currently unavailable in CAMELS-GB, and their specific effects on BFI cannot be constrained by the current study. Given the significance or importance of WRM terms in the models, it is recommended that information on WRM, particularly groundwater abstraction, should be included where possible in future large-sample hydrological datasets and in the analysis and prediction of BFI and other measures of baseflow.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference116 articles.
1. Aboelnour, M., Engle, B. A., Frisbee, M. D., Gitau, M. W., and Flanagan, D. C.: Impacts of watershed physical properties and land use on baseflow at
regional scales, J. Hydrol.: Reg. Stud., 3, 100810, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100810, 2021. 2. Addor, N., Newman, A. J., Mizukami, N., and Clark, M. P.: The CAMELS data
set: catchment attributes and meteorology for large-sample studies, Hydrol.
Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5293–5313, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5293-2017, 2017. 3. Addor, N., Nearing, G., Prieto, C., Newman, A. J., Le Vine, N., and Clark, M.
P.: A ranking of hydrological signatures based on their predictability in
space, Water Resour. Res., 54, 8792–8812, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022606, 2018. 4. Addor, N., Do, H. X., Alvarez-Garreton, C., Coxon, G., Fowler, K., and Mendoza, P. A.: Large-sample hydrology: recent progress, guidelines for new
datasets and grand challenges, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 65, 712–725,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1683182, 2020. 5. Agnew, C. T., Clifford, N. J., and Haylett, S.: Identifying and alleviating
low flows in regulated rivers: the case of the rivers Bulbourne and Gade,
Hertfordshire, UK, Regul. Rivers, 16, 245–266, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(200005/06)16:3<245::AID-RRR583>3.0.CO;2-F, 2000.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|