Technical note: Hydrology modelling R packages – a unified analysis of models and practicalities from a user perspective
-
Published:2021-07-08
Issue:7
Volume:25
Page:3937-3973
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Astagneau Paul C.ORCID, Thirel GuillaumeORCID, Delaigue OlivierORCID, Guillaume Joseph H. A., Parajka JurajORCID, Brauer Claudia C.ORCID, Viglione AlbertoORCID, Buytaert WouterORCID, Beven Keith J.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Following the rise of R as a scientific programming language, the increasing requirement for more transferable research and the growth of data availability in hydrology, R packages containing hydrological models are becoming more and more available as an open-source resource to hydrologists. Corresponding to the core of the hydrological studies workflow, their value is increasingly meaningful regarding the reliability of methods and results. Despite package and model distinctiveness, no study has ever provided a comparison of R packages for conceptual rainfall–runoff modelling from a user perspective by contrasting their philosophy, model characteristics and ease of use. We have selected eight packages based on our ability to consistently run their models on simple hydrology modelling examples. We have uniformly analysed the exact structure of seven of the hydrological models integrated into these R packages in terms of conceptual storages and fluxes, spatial discretisation, data requirements and output provided. The analysis showed that very different modelling choices are associated with these packages, which emphasises various hydrological concepts. These specificities are not always sufficiently well explained by the package documentation. Therefore a synthesis of the package functionalities was performed from a user perspective. This synthesis helps to inform the selection of which packages could/should be used depending on the problem at hand. In this regard, the technical features, documentation, R implementations and computational times were investigated. Moreover, by providing a framework for package comparison, this study is a step forward towards supporting more transferable and reusable methods and results for hydrological modelling in R.
Funder
University of Sydney Ministère de la Transition écologique et Solidaire
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference128 articles.
1. Anderson, E. A.: A point energy and mass balance model of a snow cover,
vol. 19, US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, National Weather Service, Office of Hydrology, Silver Spring, US, 1976. a 2. Anderson, E. A.: Snow accumulation and ablation model SNOW-17, NOAA’s
National Weather Service Hydrology Laboratory NWSRFS user manual, 61 pp., Silver Spring, US, 2006. a, b 3. Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Berthet, L., Le Moine, N., Lerat, J., Loumagne, C., Oudin, L., Mathevet, T., Ramos, M.-H., and Valéry, A.: HESS Opinions ”Crash tests for a standardized evaluation of hydrological models”, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1757–1764, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1757-2009, 2009. a 4. Andrews, F. T. and Guillaume, J. H.: hydromad: Hydrological Model Assessment
and Development, available at: http://hydromad.catchment.org/ (last access: 6 July 2021), R package
version 0.9-26, 2018. a, b, c, d 5. Andrews, F. T., Croke, B. F. W., and Jakeman, A. J.: An open software
environment for hydrological model assessment and development, Environ. Modell. Softw., 26, 1171–1185, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.04.006,
2011. a, b
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|