Technical note: In situ U–Th–He dating by 4He ∕ 3He laser microprobe analysis
-
Published:2023-07-19
Issue:2
Volume:5
Page:323-332
-
ISSN:2628-3719
-
Container-title:Geochronology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geochronology
Author:
Vermeesch PieterORCID, Tian Yuntao, Schwanethal Jae, Buret Yannick
Abstract
Abstract. In situ U–Th–He geochronology is a potentially disruptive technique
that combines laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass
spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) with laser microprobe noble gas mass
spectrometry. Despite its potential to revolutionize (detrital)
thermochronology, in situ U–Th–He dating is not widely used due to
persistent analytical challenges. A major issue is that current
in situ U–Th–He dating approaches require that the U, Th, and He
measurements are expressed in units of molar concentration, in
contrast with conventional methods, which use units of molar
abundance. Whereas molar abundances can be reliably determined by
isotope dilution, accurate concentration measurements are not so
easy to obtain. In the absence of matrix-matched U–Th concentration
standards and accurate He ablation pit measurements, the required
molar concentration calculations introduce an uncertainty that is
higher than the conventional method, an uncertainty that is itself
difficult to accurately quantify. We present a solution to this
problem by using proton-induced 3He as a proxy for
ablation pit volume and by pairing samples with a standard of known
U–Th–He age. Thus, the U–Th–He age equation can be solved using
relative rather than absolute concentration measurements. Pilot
experiments show that the new method produces accurate results.
However, it is prone to overdispersion, which is attributed to
gradients in the proton fluence. These gradients can be measured, and
their effect can be removed by fixing the geometry of the sample and
the standard during the proton irradiation.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference25 articles.
1. Boyce, J. W., Hodges, K. V., Olszewski, W. J., Jercinovic, M. J.,
Carpenter, B. D., and Reiners, P. W.: Laser microprobe (U-Th)/He
geochronology, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 70, 3031–3039,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2006.03.019, 2006. a, b 2. Boyce, J. W., Hodges, K. V., King, D., Crowley, J. L., Jercinovic,
M., Chatterjee, N., Bowring, S. A., and Searle, M.: Improved
confidence in (U-Th) / He thermochronology using the laser microprobe: An
example from a Pleistocene leucogranite, Nanga Parbat, Pakistan,
Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 10, Q0AA01, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GC002497, 2009. a 3. Brennan, C. J., Stockli, D. F., and Patterson, D. B.: Zircon 4He/3He
fractional loss step-heating and characterization of parent nuclide
distribution, Chem. Geol., 549, 119692, https://doi.org/10.106/j.chemgeo.2020.119692, 2020. a 4. Colleps, C., van der Beek, P., Denker, A., Amalberti, J., Dittwald, A.,
Bundesmann, J., and Bernard, M.: Improving the Efficiency of Proton
Irradiations for 4He / 3He Thermochronology, AGU Fall Meeting
12–16 December 2022, Chicago, IL, USA, 2022AGUFMEP22E1381C, EP22E–1381, 2022. a 5. Danišík, M., McInnes, B. I., Kirkland, C. L., McDonald, B. J.,
Evans, N. J., and Becker, T.: Seeing is believing: Visualization of He
distribution in zircon and implications for thermal history reconstruction on
single crystals, Sci. Adv., 3, e1601121, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601121, 2017. a
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|