Simple rules to minimise exposure to coseismic landslide hazard
-
Published:2019-04-17
Issue:4
Volume:19
Page:837-856
-
ISSN:1684-9981
-
Container-title:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Milledge David G.ORCID, Densmore Alexander L.ORCID, Bellugi DinoORCID, Rosser Nick J., Watt Jack, Li Gen, Oven Katie J.
Abstract
Abstract. Landslides constitute a hazard to life and infrastructure and their risk is
mitigated primarily by reducing exposure. This requires information on
landslide hazard on a scale that can enable informed decisions. Such
information is often unavailable to, or not easily interpreted by, those who
might need it most (e.g. householders, local governments and non-governmental organisations). To
address this shortcoming, we develop simple rules to minimise exposure to
coseismic landslide hazard that are understandable, communicable and
memorable, and that require no prior knowledge, skills or equipment to
apply. We examine rules based on two common metrics of landslide hazard,
(1) local slope and (2) upslope contributing area as a proxy for hillslope location
relative to rivers or ridge crests. In addition, we introduce and test two
new metrics: the maximum angle to the skyline and the hazard area, defined
as the upslope area with slope >40∘ from which
landslide debris can reach a location without passing over a slope of
<10∘. We then test the skill with which each metric can
identify landslide hazard – defined as the probability of being hit by a
landslide – using inventories of landslides triggered by six earthquakes
that occurred between 1993 and 2015. We find that the maximum skyline angle
and hazard area provide the most skilful predictions, and these results form
the basis for two simple rules: “minimise your maximum angle to the
skyline” and “avoid steep (>10∘) channels with many steep
(>40∘) areas that are upslope”. Because local slope
alone is also a skilful predictor of landslide hazard, we can formulate a
third rule as “minimise the angle of the slope under your feet, especially on
steep hillsides, but not at the expense of increasing skyline angle or
hazard area”. In contrast, the upslope contributing area has a weaker and more
complex relationship to hazard than the other predictors. Our simple rules
complement but do not replace detailed site-specific investigation: they
can be used for initial estimations of landslide hazard or to guide
decision-making in the absence of any other information.
Funder
Natural Environment Research Council
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference95 articles.
1. Alexander, D.: Vulnerability to landslides, in: Landslide Hazard and Risk,
Wiley, Chichester, 175–198, 2005. 2. Atwater, B. F., Cisternas, M. V., Bourgeois, J., Dudley, W. C., Hendley, J.
W., and Stauffer, P. H.: Surviving a tsunami – lessons from Chile, Hawaii,
and Japan, No. 1187, Geological Survey (USGS), 1999. 3. Avouac, J. P., Meng, L., Wei, S., Wang, T., and Ampuero, J. P.: Lower edge of
locked Main Himalayan Thrust unzipped by the 2015 Gorkha earthquake, Nat.
Geosci., 8, 708–711, 2015. 4. Bellugi, D., Dietrich, W. E., Stock, J., McKean, J., Kazian, B., and
Hargrove, P.: Spatially explicit shallow landslide susceptibility mapping
over large areas, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on
Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, prediction and assessment, Italian
Journal of Engineering Geology and Environment, 759–768,
https://doi.org/10.4408/IJEGE.2011-03.B-045, 2011. 5. Benda, L. E. and Cundy, T. W.: Predicting deposition of debris flows in
mountain channels, Can. Geotech. J., 27, 409–417, 1990.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|