Introduction: Handling uncertainty in the geosciences: identification, mitigation and communication
-
Published:2020-05-15
Issue:3
Volume:11
Page:889-897
-
ISSN:1869-9529
-
Container-title:Solid Earth
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Solid Earth
Author:
Pérez-Díaz LucíaORCID, Alcalde JuanORCID, Bond Clare E.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. In the geosciences, data are acquired, processed, analysed, modelled and
interpreted in order to generate knowledge. Such a complex procedure is
affected by uncertainties related to the objective (e.g. the data,
technologies and techniques employed) as well as the subjective (knowledge,
skills and biases of the geoscientist) aspects of the knowledge generation
workflow. Unlike in other scientific disciplines, uncertainty and its impact
on the validity of geoscientific outputs have often been overlooked or only
discussed superficially. However, for geological outputs to provide
meaningful insights, the uncertainties, errors and assumptions made
throughout the data acquisition, processing, modelling and interpretation
procedures need to be carefully considered. This special issue illustrates
and brings attention to why and how uncertainty handling (i.e. analysis,
mitigation and communication) is a critical aspect within the geosciences.
In this introductory paper, we (1) outline the terminology and describe the
relationships between a number of descriptors often used to characterise and
classify uncertainty and error, (2) present the collection of research papers
that together form the special issue, the idea for which stems from a 2018
European Geosciences Union's General Assembly session entitled
“Understanding the unknowns: recognition, quantification, influence and minimisation of uncertainty in the geosciences”, and (3) discuss the limitations of the “traditional” treatment of
uncertainty in the geosciences. “The efforts of many researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and it is likely that, if they continue, we will soon know nothing about it at all.” – Mark Twain
Funder
European Research Council
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Paleontology,Stratigraphy,Earth-Surface Processes,Geochemistry and Petrology,Geology,Geophysics,Soil Science
Reference26 articles.
1. Alcalde, J., Bond, C. E., Johnson, G., Butler, R. W. H., Cooper, M. A., and
Ellis, J. F.: The importance of structural model availability on seismic
interpretation, J. Struct. Geol., 97, 161–171,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2017.03.003, 2017. 2. Alcalde, J., Bond, C. E., Johnson, G., Kloppenburg, A., Ferrer, O., Bell, R., and Ayarza, P.: Fault interpretation in seismic reflection data: an experiment analysing the impact of conceptual model anchoring and vertical exaggeration, Solid Earth, 10, 1651–1662, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-1651-2019, 2019. 3. Andrews, B. J., Roberts, J. J., Shipton, Z. K., Bigi, S., Tartarello, M. C., and Johnson, G.: How do we see fractures? Quantifying subjective bias in fracture data collection, Solid Earth, 10, 487–516, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-487-2019, 2019. 4. Bárbara, C. P., Cabello, P., Bouche, A., Aarnes, I., Gordillo, C., Ferrer, O., Roma, M., and Arbués, P.: Quantifying the impact of the structural uncertainty on the gross rock volume in the Lubina and Montanazo oil fields (Western Mediterranean), Solid Earth, 10, 1597–1619, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-1597-2019, 2019. 5. Bodur, Ö. F. and Rey, P. F.: The impact of rheological uncertainty on dynamic topography predictions, Solid Earth, 10, 2167–2178, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-2167-2019, 2019.
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|