The Fire Modeling Intercomparison Project (FireMIP), phase 1: experimental and analytical protocols with detailed model descriptions
-
Published:2017-03-17
Issue:3
Volume:10
Page:1175-1197
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Rabin Sam S.ORCID, Melton Joe R.ORCID, Lasslop GittaORCID, Bachelet DominiqueORCID, Forrest MatthewORCID, Hantson StijnORCID, Kaplan Jed O.ORCID, Li FangORCID, Mangeon Stéphane, Ward Daniel S., Yue ChaoORCID, Arora Vivek K., Hickler Thomas, Kloster Silvia, Knorr Wolfgang, Nieradzik Lars, Spessa Allan, Folberth Gerd A.ORCID, Sheehan Tim, Voulgarakis ApostolosORCID, Kelley Douglas I.ORCID, Prentice I. Colin, Sitch Stephen, Harrison Sandy, Arneth AlmutORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The important role of fire in regulating vegetation community composition and contributions to emissions of greenhouse gases and aerosols make it a critical component of dynamic global vegetation models and Earth system models. Over 2 decades of development, a wide variety of model structures and mechanisms have been designed and incorporated into global fire models, which have been linked to different vegetation models. However, there has not yet been a systematic examination of how these different strategies contribute to model performance. Here we describe the structure of the first phase of the Fire Model Intercomparison Project (FireMIP), which for the first time seeks to systematically compare a number of models. By combining a standardized set of input data and model experiments with a rigorous comparison of model outputs to each other and to observations, we will improve the understanding of what drives vegetation fire, how it can best be simulated, and what new or improved observational data could allow better constraints on model behavior. In this paper, we introduce the fire models used in the first phase of FireMIP, the simulation protocols applied, and the benchmarking system used to evaluate the models. We have also created supplementary tables that describe, in thorough mathematical detail, the structure of each model.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference120 articles.
1. Adams, M. A.: Mega-fires, tipping points and ecosystem services: Managing forests and woodlands in an uncertain future, Forest Ecol. Manage., 254, 250–261, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.11.039, 2013. 2. Ahlström, A., Schurgers, G., Arneth, A., and Smith, B.: Robustness and uncertainty in terrestrial ecosystem carbon response to CMIP5 climate change projections, Environ. Res. Lett., 7, 044008-10, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044008, 2012. 3. Alonso-Canas, I. and Chuvieco, E.: Global burned area mapping from ENVISAT-MERIS and MODIS active fire data, Remote Sens. Environ., 163, 140–152, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.03.011, 2015. 4. Archibald, S., Lehmann, C. E. R., Gomez-Dans, J. L., and Bradstock, R. A.: Defining pyromes and global syndromes of fire regimes, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 110, 6442–6447, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211466110, 2013. 5. Arora, V. K. and Boer, G.: Fire as an interactive component of dynamic vegetation models, J. Geophys. Res., 110, G02008, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JG000042, 2005.
Cited by
166 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|