Abstract
Abstract. This paper analyses from a philosophical and
interdisciplinary point of view two master plans of the canton Ticino – the
first one from 1990, Keynesian, and the second one from 2009, neoliberal.
The differences between the former and the latter are highlighted on a
conceptual level. While the former stresses the importance of rebalancing
and maintaining internal solidarity between the regions of the canton, the
latter aims to make the canton more competitive and specialised. The
discussion highlights how this type of analysis, by showing the political
and moral concepts and criteria underlying a master plan, favours their
political discussion and thus, ultimately, the implementation of a more
inclusive planning process.
Funder
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Anthropology,Geography, Planning and Development,Global and Planetary Change
Reference94 articles.
1. Allmendinger, P. and Haughton, G.: The Evolution and Trajectories of English
Spatial Governance: `Neoliberal' Episodes in Planning, Planning, Practice & Research, 28, 6–26, 2013.
2. Ambal, J.: Projets urbains et imaginaires de la mobilité, les nouveaux
récits de la fabrique métropolitaine: le cas du mégaprojet
Bordeaux Euratlantique, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, 2019.
3. Antonini, B.: Principi operativi e metodo di lavoro del Piano direttore del
Canton Ticino, Rivista Tecnica, 5, 84–90, 1983.
4. Arboleda, M.: Financialization, totality and planetary urbanization in the
Chilean Andes, Geoforum, 67, 4–13, 2015.
5. Attoh, K. A.: What kind of right is the right to the city?, Prog. Hum. Geog., 35, 669–685,
2011.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献