Quantification of the total ion transport in the near-Earth plasma sheet
-
Published:2017-07-26
Issue:4
Volume:35
Page:869-877
-
ISSN:1432-0576
-
Container-title:Annales Geophysicae
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Ann. Geophys.
Author:
Slapak RikardORCID, Hamrin Maria, Pitkänen TimoORCID, Yamauchi MasatoshiORCID, Nilsson HansORCID, Karlsson Tomas, Schillings AudreyORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Recent studies strongly suggest that a majority of the observed O+ cusp outflows will eventually escape into the solar wind, rather than be transported to the plasma sheet. Therefore, an investigation of plasma sheet flows will add to these studies and give a more complete picture of magnetospheric ion dynamics. Specifically, it will provide a greater understanding of atmospheric loss. We have used Cluster spacecraft 4 to quantify the H+ and O+ total transports in the near-Earth plasma sheet, using data covering 2001–2005. The results show that both H+ and O+ have earthward net fluxes of the orders of 1026 and 1024 s−1, respectively. The O+ plasma sheet return flux is 1 order of magnitude smaller than the O+ outflows observed in the cusps, strengthening the view that most ionospheric O+ outflows do escape. The H+ return flux is approximately the same as the ionospheric outflow, suggesting a stable budget of H+ in the magnetosphere. However, low-energy H+, not detectable by the ion spectrometer, is not considered in our study, leaving the complete magnetospheric H+ circulation an open question. Studying tailward flows separately reveals a total tailward O+ flux of about 0. 5 × 1025 s−1, which can be considered as a lower limit of the nightside auroral region O+ outflow. Lower velocity flows ( < 100 km s−1) contribute most to the total transports, whereas the high-velocity flows contribute very little, suggesting that bursty bulk flows are not dominant in plasma sheet mass transport.
Funder
Swedish National Space Agency
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Space and Planetary Science,Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Atmospheric Science,Geology,Astronomy and Astrophysics
Reference48 articles.
1. Abe, T., Watanabe, S., Whalen, B., Yau, A. W., and Sagawa, E.: Observations of polar wind and thermal ion outflow by Akebono/SMS, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 48, 319–325, https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.48.319, 1996. 2. André, M. and Cully, C. M.: Low-energy ions: A previously hidden solar system particle population, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L03101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050242, 2012. 3. Angelopoulos, V., Baumjohann, W., Kennel, C. F., Coroniti, F. V., Kivelson, M. G., Pellat, R., Walker, R. J., Lühr, H., and Paschmann, G.: Bursty bulk flows in the inner central plasma sheet, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 4027–4039, https://doi.org/10.1029/91JA02701, 1992. 4. Angelopoulos, V., Kennel, C. F., Coroniti, F. V., Pellat, R., Kivelson, M. G., Walker, R. J., Russell, C. T., Baumjohann, W., Feldman, W. C., and Gosling, J. T.: Statistical characteristics of bursty bulk flow events, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 21257–21280, https://doi.org/10.1029/94JA01263, 1994. 5. Angelopoulos, V., Mozer, F. S., Lin, R. P., Mukai, T., Tsuruda, K., Lepping, R., and Baumjohann, W.: Comment on “Geotail survey of ion flow in the plasma sheet: Observations between 10 and 50 RE” by W. R. Paterson et al., J. Geophys. Res., 104, 17521–17525, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JA900198, 1999.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|