The impact on global magnetohydrodynamic simulations from varying initialisation methods: results from GUMICS-4
-
Published:2017-08-01
Issue:4
Volume:35
Page:907-922
-
ISSN:1432-0576
-
Container-title:Annales Geophysicae
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Ann. Geophys.
Author:
Lakka Antti, Pulkkinen Tuija I.ORCID, Dimmock Andrew P.ORCID, Osmane Adnane, Honkonen Ilja, Palmroth MinnaORCID, Janhunen Pekka
Abstract
Abstract. We investigate the effects of different initialisation methods of the GUMICS-4 global magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulation to the dynamics in different parts of the Earth's magnetosphere and hence compare five 12 h simulation runs that were initiated by 3 h of synthetic data and followed by 9 h of solar wind measurements using the OMNI data as input. As a reference, we use a simulation run that includes nearly 60 h of OMNI data as input prior to the 9 h interval examined with different initialisations. The selected interval is a high-speed stream event during a 10-day interval (12–22 June 2007). The synthetic initialisations include stepwise, linear and sinusoidal functions of the interplanetary magnetic field with constant density and velocity values. The results show that the solutions converge within 1 h to give a good agreement in both the bow shock and the magnetopause position. However, the different initialisation methods lead to local differences which should be taken into consideration when comparing model results to satellite measurements.
Funder
Luonnontieteiden ja Tekniikan Tutkimuksen Toimikunta
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Space and Planetary Science,Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Atmospheric Science,Geology,Astronomy and Astrophysics
Reference32 articles.
1. Axford, W. I. and Hines, C. O.: A unifying theory of high-latitude geophysical phenomena and geomagnetic storms, Can. J. Phys., 39, 1433–1464, https://doi.org/10.1139/p61-172, 1961. 2. Bhattarai, S. K., Lopez, R. E., Bruntz, R., Lyon, J. G., and Wiltberger, M.: Simulation of the polar cap potential during periods with northward interplanetary magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 117, a04219, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA017143, 2012. 3. Birn, J., Drake, J. F., Shay, M. A., Rogers, B. N., Denton, R. E., Hesse, M., Kuznetsova, M., Ma, Z. W., Bhattacharjee, A., Otto, A., and Pritchett, P. L.: Geospace Environmental Modeling (GEM) Magnetic Reconnection Challenge, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 106, 3715–3719, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JA900449, 2001. 4. Büchner, J., Dum, J., and Schole, M.: Space Plasma Simulation, Vol. 615, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2003. 5. Burch, J. L., Torbert, R. B., Phan, T. D., Chen, L.-J., Moore, T. E., Ergun, R. E., Eastwood, J. P., Gershman, D. J., Cassak, P. A., Argall, M. R., Wang, S., Hesse, M., Pollock, C. J., Giles, B. L., Nakamura, R., Mauk, B. H., Fuselier, S. A., Russell, C. T., Strangeway, R. J., Drake, J. F., Shay, M. A., Khotyaintsev, Y. V., Lindqvist, P.-A., Marklund, G., Wilder, F. D., Young, D. T., Torkar, K., Goldstein, J., Dorelli, J. C., Avanov, L. A., Oka, M., Baker, D. N., Jaynes, A. N., Goodrich, K. A., Cohen, I. J., Turner, D. L., Fennell, J. F., Blake, J. B., Clemmons, J., Goldman, M., Newman, D., Petrinec, S. M., Trattner, K. J., Lavraud, B., Reiff, P. H., Baumjohann, W., Magnes, W., Steller, M., Lewis, W., Saito, Y., Coffey, V., and Chandler, M.: Electron-scale measurements of magnetic reconnection in space, Science, 352, 27174677, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2939, 2016.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|