Scaling effects of fixed-wing ground-generation airborne wind energy systems
-
Published:2022-09-12
Issue:5
Volume:7
Page:1847-1868
-
ISSN:2366-7451
-
Container-title:Wind Energy Science
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Wind Energ. Sci.
Author:
Sommerfeld MarkusORCID, Dörenkämper MartinORCID, De Schutter Jochem, Crawford CurranORCID
Abstract
Abstract. While some airborne wind energy system (AWES) companies aim at small, temporary or remote off-grid markets, others aim at utility-scale, multi-megawatt integration into the electricity grid. This study investigates the scaling effects of single-wing, ground-generation AWESs from small- to utility-scale systems, subject to realistic 10 min, onshore and offshore wind conditions derived from a numerical mesoscale Weather Research And Forecasting (WRF) model. To reduce computational cost, vertical wind velocity profiles are grouped into 10 clusters using k-means clustering. Three representative profiles from each cluster are implemented into a nonlinear AWES optimal control model to determine power-optimal trajectories. We compare the effects of three different aircraft masses and two sets of nonlinear aerodynamic coefficients for aircraft with wing areas ranging from 10 to 150 m2 on operating parameters and flight trajectories. We predict size- and mass-dependent AWES power curves, annual energy production (AEP) and capacity factors (cf) and compare them to a quasi-steady-state reference model. Instantaneous force, tether-reeling speed and power fluctuations as well as power losses associated with tether drag and system mass are quantified.
Funder
Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference56 articles.
1. Airborne Wind Europe: Airborne Wind Energy Glossary,
https://airbornewindeurope.org/resources/glossary-2/, last access: 29 March 2022. a 2. Ampyx: Ampyx Power BV, https://www.ampyxpower.com/, last access: 5 June 2020. a, b, c, d 3. Andersson, J., Åkesson, J., and Diehl, M.: CasADi: A Symbolic Package for Automatic Differentiation and Optimal Control, in: Recent Advances in Algorithmic Differentiation, edited by: Forth, S., Hovland, P., Phipps, E., Utke, J., and Walther, A., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 297–307, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30023-3_27, 2012. a 4. Andersson, J. A. E., Gillis, J., Horn, G., Rawlings, J. B., and Diehl, M.:
CasADi – A software framework for nonlinear optimization and optimal
control, Math. Program. Comput., 11, 1–36, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12532-018-0139-4, 2019. a 5. Archer, C. L. and Caldeira, K.: Global Assessment of High-Altitude Wind Power, Energies, 2, 307–319, https://doi.org/10.3390/en20200307, 2009. a
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|