Pore network modeling as a new tool for determining gas diffusivity in peat
-
Published:2022-11-02
Issue:21
Volume:19
Page:5041-5058
-
ISSN:1726-4189
-
Container-title:Biogeosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biogeosciences
Author:
Kiuru PetriORCID, Palviainen Marjo, Marchionne Arianna, Grönholm Tiia, Raivonen Maarit, Kohl LukasORCID, Laurén AnnamariORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Peatlands are globally significant carbon stocks and may become major sources of the greenhouse gases (GHGs) carbon dioxide and methane in a changing climate and under anthropogenic management pressure. Diffusion is the dominant gas transport mechanism in peat; therefore, a proper knowledge of the soil gas diffusion coefficient is important for the estimation of GHG emissions from peatlands. Pore network modeling (PNM) is a potential tool for the determination of gas diffusivity in peat, as it explicitly connects the peat microstructure and the characteristics of the peat pore network to macroscopic gas transport properties. In the present work, we extracted macropore networks from three-dimensional X-ray micro-computed tomography (µCT) images of peat samples and simulated gas diffusion in these networks using PNM. These results were compared to the soil gas diffusion coefficients determined from the same samples in the laboratory using the diffusion chamber method. The measurements and simulations were conducted for peat samples from three depths. The soil gas diffusion coefficients were determined under varying water contents adjusted in a pressure plate apparatus. We also assessed the applicability of commonly used gas diffusivity models to peat. The laboratory measurements showed a decrease in gas diffusivity with depth due to a decrease in air-filled porosity and pore space connectivity. However, gas diffusivity was not extremely low close to saturation, which may indicate that the structure of the macropore network is such that it enables the presence of connected diffusion pathways through the peat matrix, even in wet conditions. The traditional gas diffusivity models were not very successful in predicting the soil gas diffusion coefficient. This may indicate that the microstructure of peat differs considerably from the structure of mineral soils and other kinds of porous materials for which these models have been constructed and calibrated. By contrast, the pore network simulations reproduced the laboratory-determined soil gas diffusion coefficients rather well. Thus, the combination of the µCT and PNM methods may offer a promising alternative to the traditional estimation of soil gas diffusivity through laboratory measurements.
Funder
Academy of Finland H2020 Excellent Science H2020 Societal Challenges
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference99 articles.
1. Abdalla, M., Hastings, A., Truu, J., Espenberg, M., Mander, Ü., and Smith,
P.: Emissions of methane from northern peatlands: a review of management
impacts and implications for future management options, Ecol. Evol., 6,
7080–7102, https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2469, 2016. a, b 2. Akaike, H.: A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE T.
Automat. Contr., 19, 716–723, https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705, 1974. a 3. Bakker, J. W. and Hidding, A.: The influence of soil structure and air content
on gas diffusion in soils, Neth. J. Agr. Sci., 18, 37–48,
https://doi.org/10.18174/njas.v18i1.17354, 1970. a 4. Ball, B. C. and Smith, K. A.: Gas movement and air-filled porosity, in: Soil
and Environmental Analysis: Physical Methods, 2nd Edn., edited by: Smith,
K. A. and Mullins, C. E., 499–538, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, ISBN
978-0-8247-0414-8, 2001. a 5. Beven, K. and Germann, P.: Macropores and water flow in soils, Water Resour.
Res., 18, 1311–1325, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR018i005p01311, 1982. a
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|