Impact of stratospheric aerosol intervention geoengineering on surface air temperature in China: a surface energy budget perspective
-
Published:2022-06-14
Issue:11
Volume:22
Page:7667-7680
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Liu Zhaochen, Lang Xianmei, Jiang DabangORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Stratospheric aerosol intervention (SAI) geoengineering is a proposed scheme to counteract anthropogenic global warming, but the climate response to SAI, with great regional disparities, remains uncertain. In this study, we use Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project G4 experiment simulations from six models that counteract anthropogenic forcing under medium–low emissions (Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5 – RCP4.5) by injecting a certain amount of SO2 into the stratosphere every year to investigate the surface air temperature response to SAI geoengineering over China. We have found that SAI has led to surface cooling over China during the last 40 years of injection simulation (2030–2069), which varies among models, regions, and seasons. Decreased tropospheric temperature and water vapor and increased stratospheric aerosols induce robust decreases in downward clear-sky longwave and shortwave radiation fluxes at the surface, respectively, dominating the temperature change over China. Changes in cloud effective forcing and surface albedo feedback also relate to the temperature response but with large spatial and seasonal variations. We find that the increased summer cloud cover and winter surface albedo lead to strong cooling, while the decreased summer cloud cover and winter surface albedo lead to weak cooling or even insignificant warming for the certain subregions and models. Our results suggest that cloud and land surface processes in models dominate the spatial pattern of SAI-induced surface air temperature change over China.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference61 articles.
1. Arora, V. K., Scinocca, J. F., Boer, G. J., Christian, J. R., Denman, K. L.,
Flato, G. M., Kharin, V. V., Lee, W. G., and Merryfield, W. J.: Carbon
emission limits required to satisfy future representative concentration
pathways of greenhouse gases, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L05805,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046270, 2011. 2. Bala, G., Duffy, P. B., and Taylor, K. E.: Impact of geoengineering schemes
on the global hydrological cycle, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105,
7664–7669, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711648105, 2008. 3. Bellouin, N., Rae, J., Jones, A., Johnson, C., Haywood, J., and Boucher, O.:
Aerosol forcing in the Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5)
simulations by HadGEM2-ES and the role of ammonium nitrate, J. Geophys.
Res., 116, D20206, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016074, 2011. 4. Bluth, G. J., Doiron, S. D., Schnetzler, C. C., Krueger, A. J., and Walter,
L. S.: Global tracking of the SO2 clouds from the June, 1991 Mount
Pinatubo eruptions, Geophy. Res. Lett., 19, 151–154,
https://doi.org/10.1029/91GL02792, 1992. 5. Budyko, M. I.: Climatic Changes, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC,
244 pp., https://doi.org/10.1029/SP010, 1977.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|