Framing REDD+: political ecology, actor–network theory (ANT), and the making of forest carbon markets
-
Published:2023-05-17
Issue:2
Volume:78
Page:255-265
-
ISSN:2194-8798
-
Container-title:Geographica Helvetica
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geogr. Helv.
Author:
Schumacher Juliane Miriam
Abstract
Abstract. This paper discusses the opportunities and challenges of integrating science and technology studies (STS), especially the variant based on actor–network theory (ANT), into fields of human geography with a critical research tradition. Drawing on the experiences of political ecology and empirical research on carbon markets, it uses the example of reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) to show how the turn towards such STS impacts has changed the “framing” of REDD+: from analysing REDD+ as an example of the “neoliberalization of nature” and a focus on the impacts on human forest users to detailed accounts of infrastructures and practices of making markets. Discussing the consequences of these observations and different proposals brought forward to combine ANT with political ecology, the paper argues for a conscious and reflective use of ANT-inspired STS approaches to benefit from the additional insights this approach allows while keeping the critical potential of geography alive.
Funder
Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Anthropology,Geography, Planning and Development,Global and Planetary Change
Reference97 articles.
1. Agarwal, A. and Narain, S.: Global Warming in an Unequal World: A Case of Environmental Colonialism, Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi, 1991. 2. Agrawal, A., Nelson, F., Adams, W. M., and Sandbrook, C.: Governance and REDD: a reply to Wunder, Oryx, 44, 337–338, 2010. 3. Anderson, B., Kearnes, M., McFarlane, C., and Swanton, D.: On assemblages and geography, Dialog. Hum. Geogr., 2, 171–189, https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820612449261, 2012. 4. Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Duchelle, A. E., Larson, A., Martius, C., Sunderlin, W. D., Verchot, L., Wong, G., and Wunder, S.: Learning from REDD+: A response to Fletcher et al, Conserv. Biol., 31, 718–720, 2017. 5. Asiyanbi, A.: A political ecology of REDD+: Property rights, militarised protectionism, and carbonised exclusion in Cross River, Geoforum, 77, 146–156, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.10.016, 2016.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|