Reproductive Justice: Impulse für intersektionale Bevölkerungsgeographien

Author:

Hübl Susanne

Abstract

Abstract. Black women are three to four times more likely to die during childbirth than white women. Research in population geography and demography highlight factors such as educational background or access to health services as social determinants of fertility, to better understand these reproductive inequalities. Notwithstanding these determinants are key causes for reproductive outcomes, the question of how these determinants are embedded in global power relations remains mainly unresolved. As a feminist science intervention, this article develops two impetuses for a power-sensitive, intersectional knowledge production in the field of population geographies. Therefore, the article cursorily refers to current activist protests in the name of reproductive justice, a concept developed by black feminists in the US. It argues that a multi-scalar analysis of reproductive relations helps to shift the focus from the demographic question „who is born?“ to „how are life chances unevenly distributed?“. Reproductive justice suggests that smaller scales such as the body or the womb constitute helpful analytical entry points to disentangle the powerful webs, within which reproductive outcomes are embedded. Finally, the article outlines a future research design towards geographies of reproductive justice.

Publisher

Copernicus GmbH

Subject

Earth-Surface Processes,Anthropology,Geography, Planning and Development,Global and Planetary Change

Reference56 articles.

1. Alaimo, S.: Trans-Corporeal Feminisms and the Ethical Space of Nature, in: Material feminisms, Herausgeber: Alaimo, S., Indiana Univ. Press, Bloomington, Indiana, 237–264, ISBN 9780253013606, 2008.

2. Apfel, A.: Birth work as care work: Stories from activist birth communities, Kairos, PM Press, Oakland, California, ISBN 9781629631516, 2016.

3. Bey, A., Brill, A., Porchia-Albert, C., Gradilla, M. und Strauss, N.: Advancing Birth Justice: Community-Based Doula Models as a Standard of Care for Ending Racial Disparities, https://b5c19f22-2ef4-49b4-94b0-7621fdb5dbba.filesusr.com/ugd/f36f23_7d936f97617a4e34aaddd8a052ac1de6.pdf (letzter Zugriff: 13. März 2022), 2019.

4. Bhatia, R.: Tricky Tools for Feminist Struggle: Sex Ratios as Indicators of the Status of Women and Girls, Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 6, https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v6i2.32805, 2020.

5. Bhatia, R., Sasser, J. S., Ojeda, D., Hendrixson, A., Nadimpally, S. und Foley, E. E.: A feminist exploration of ‚populationism‘: engaging contemporary forms of population control, Gender Place Cult., 44, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2018.1553859, 2019.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3