Convective gravity wave events during summer near 54° N, present in both AIRS and Rayleigh–Mie–Raman (RMR) lidar observations
-
Published:2024-02-01
Issue:2
Volume:24
Page:1543-1558
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Franco-Diaz EframirORCID, Gerding MichaelORCID, Holt LauraORCID, Strelnikova Irina, Wing RobinORCID, Baumgarten GerdORCID, Lübken Franz-Josef
Abstract
Abstract. We connect tropospheric deep convective events over western Europe, as measured by the 8.1 µm radiance observations from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) on NASA's Aqua satellite, to horizontal brightness temperature variance in the 4.3 µm AIRS channel (maximum sensitivity at around 40 km) and temperature perturbations in vertical lidar profiles (between 33-43 km) over Kühlungsborn, Germany (54.12∘ N, 11.77∘ E). Although the lidar and AIRS are sensitive to different parts of the gravity wave spectrum, they both capture the same peaks in gravity wave activity tied to convection. This suggests that a broad range of vertical wavelengths is present in the convective gravity waves. To account for wave propagation conditions from the troposphere to the stratosphere, we also consider the horizontal winds in the troposphere and stratosphere using the ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) operational analysis. In this work, we highlight sporadic peaks in gravity wave activity in summer greatly exceeding those typical of summer, which is generally a season with lower wave activity compared to winter. Although these events are present in roughly half of the years (between 2003 and 2019), we focus our study on two case study years (2014 and 2015). These case study years were chosen because of the high cadence of lidar soundings close in time to the convective events. These events, while sporadic, could contribute significantly to the zonal mean momentum budget and are not accounted for in weather and climate models.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Earth Sciences Division
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference56 articles.
1. Alexander, M. J.: A simulated spectrum of convectively generated gravity waves: Propagation from the tropopause to the mesopause and effects on the middle atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 1571–1588, https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD02046, 1996. a 2. Alexander, M. J.: Interpretations of observed climatological patterns in stratospheric gravity waves variance, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 8627–8640, 1998. a 3. Alexander, M. J. and Barnet, C.: Using Satellite Observations to Constrain Parameterizations of Gravity Wave Effects for Global Models, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 1652–1665, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3897.1, 2006. a 4. Alexander, M. J., Holton, J. R., and Durran, D. R.: The gravity wave response above deep convection in a squall line simulation, J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 2212–2226, 1995. a 5. Alexander, M. J., Geller, M., McLandress, C., Polavarapu, S., Preusse, P., Sassi, F., Sato, K., Eckermann, S. D., Ern, M., Hertzog, A., Kawatani, Y., Pulido, M., Shaw, T. A., Sigmond, M., Vincent, R., and Watanabe, S.: Recent developments in gravity-wave effects in climate models and the global distribution of gravity-wave momentum flux from observations and models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136, 1103–1124, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.637, 2010. a
|
|