Ideas and perspectives: Allocation of carbon from net primary production in models is inconsistent with observations of the age of respired carbon
-
Published:2022-08-16
Issue:16
Volume:19
Page:3727-3738
-
ISSN:1726-4189
-
Container-title:Biogeosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biogeosciences
Author:
Sierra Carlos A.ORCID, Ceballos-Núñez Verónika, Hartmann Henrik, Herrera-Ramírez DavidORCID, Metzler HolgerORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Carbon allocation in vegetation is an important process in the terrestrial carbon cycle; it determines the fate of photoassimilates, and it has an impact on the time carbon spends in the terrestrial biosphere. Although previous studies have highlighted important conceptual issues in the definition and metrics used to assess carbon allocation, very little emphasis has been placed on the distinction between the allocation of carbon from gross primary production (GPP) and the allocation from net primary production (NPP). An important number of simulation models and conceptual frameworks are based on the concept that C is allocated from NPP, which implies that C is respired immediately after photosynthetic assimilation. However, empirical work that estimates the age of respired CO2 from vegetation tissue (foliage, stems, roots) shows that it may take from years to decades to respire previously produced photosynthates. The transit time distribution of carbon in vegetation and ecosystems, a metric that provides an estimate of the age of respired carbon, indicates that vegetation pools respire carbon of a wide range of ages, on timescales that are in conflict with the assumption that autotrophic respiration only consumes recently fixed carbon. In this contribution, we attempt to provide compelling evidence based on recent research on the age of respired carbon and the theory of timescales of carbon in ecosystems, with the aim to promote a change in the predominant paradigm implemented in ecosystem models where carbon allocation is based on NPP. In addition, we highlight some implications for understanding and modeling carbon dynamics in terrestrial ecosystems.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference72 articles.
1. Amthor, J. S.: The McCree-de Wit-Penning de Vries-Thornley Respiration
Paradigms: 30 Years Later, Ann. Bot., 86, 1–20,
https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2000.1175, 2000. a, b 2. Arora, V. K. and Boer, G. J.: A parameterization of leaf phenology for the
terrestrial ecosystem component of climate models, Global Change Biol., 11,
39–59, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00890.x, 2005. a 3. Beer, C., Reichstein, M., Tomelleri, E., Ciais, P., Jung, M., Carvalhais, N.,
Rödenbeck, C., Arain, M. A., Baldocchi, D., Bonan, G. B., Bondeau, A.,
Cescatti, A., Lasslop, G., Lindroth, A., Lomas, M., Luyssaert, S., Margolis,
H., Oleson, K. W., Roupsard, O., Veenendaal, E., Viovy, N., Williams, C.,
Woodward, F. I., and Papale, D.: Terrestrial Gross Carbon Dioxide Uptake:
Global Distribution and Covariation with Climate, Science, 329, 834–838,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1184984, 2010. a 4. Bolin, B. and Rodhe, H.: A note on the concepts of age distribution and transit
time in natural reservoirs, Tellus, 25, 58–62,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1973.tb01594.x, 1973. a, b 5. Carbone, M. S. and Trumbore, S. E.: Contribution of new photosynthetic
assimilates to respiration by perennial grasses and shrubs: residence times
and allocation patterns, New Phytol., 176, 124–135,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02153.x, 2007. a, b, c
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|