Global Carbon Budget 2022

Author:

Friedlingstein PierreORCID,O'Sullivan MichaelORCID,Jones Matthew W.,Andrew Robbie M.ORCID,Gregor LukeORCID,Hauck JudithORCID,Le Quéré CorinneORCID,Luijkx Ingrid T.ORCID,Olsen AreORCID,Peters Glen P.ORCID,Peters WouterORCID,Pongratz JuliaORCID,Schwingshackl ClemensORCID,Sitch Stephen,Canadell Josep G.ORCID,Ciais PhilippeORCID,Jackson Robert B.ORCID,Alin Simone R.ORCID,Alkama Ramdane,Arneth AlmutORCID,Arora Vivek K.,Bates Nicholas R.,Becker MeikeORCID,Bellouin NicolasORCID,Bittig Henry C.ORCID,Bopp LaurentORCID,Chevallier FrédéricORCID,Chini Louise P.ORCID,Cronin Margot,Evans WileyORCID,Falk StefanieORCID,Feely Richard A.,Gasser ThomasORCID,Gehlen MarionORCID,Gkritzalis Thanos,Gloege Lucas,Grassi Giacomo,Gruber NicolasORCID,Gürses ÖzgürORCID,Harris Ian,Hefner Matthew,Houghton Richard A.ORCID,Hurtt George C.ORCID,Iida YosukeORCID,Ilyina TatianaORCID,Jain Atul K.ORCID,Jersild Annika,Kadono Koji,Kato EtsushiORCID,Kennedy Daniel,Klein Goldewijk KeesORCID,Knauer JürgenORCID,Korsbakken Jan IvarORCID,Landschützer PeterORCID,Lefèvre Nathalie,Lindsay KeithORCID,Liu JunjieORCID,Liu ZhuORCID,Marland Gregg,Mayot NicolasORCID,McGrath Matthew J.ORCID,Metzl Nicolas,Monacci Natalie M.ORCID,Munro David R.ORCID,Nakaoka Shin-IchiroORCID,Niwa Yosuke,O'Brien Kevin,Ono Tsuneo,Palmer Paul I.ORCID,Pan Naiqing,Pierrot DenisORCID,Pocock Katie,Poulter BenjaminORCID,Resplandy Laure,Robertson Eddy,Rödenbeck ChristianORCID,Rodriguez Carmen,Rosan Thais M.ORCID,Schwinger JörgORCID,Séférian RolandORCID,Shutler Jamie D.ORCID,Skjelvan IngunnORCID,Steinhoff Tobias,Sun QingORCID,Sutton Adrienne J.ORCID,Sweeney ColmORCID,Takao Shintaro,Tanhua TosteORCID,Tans Pieter P.,Tian Xiangjun,Tian Hanqin,Tilbrook BronteORCID,Tsujino HiroyukiORCID,Tubiello FrancescoORCID,van der Werf Guido R.,Walker Anthony P.ORCID,Wanninkhof Rik,Whitehead Chris,Willstrand Wranne Anna,Wright RebeccaORCID,Yuan Wenping,Yue ChaoORCID,Yue XuORCID,Zaehle SönkeORCID,Zeng Jiye,Zheng BoORCID

Abstract

Abstract. Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere in a changing climate is critical to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe and synthesize data sets and methodologies to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. Fossil CO2 emissions (EFOS) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, while emissions from land-use change (ELUC), mainly deforestation, are based on land use and land-use change data and bookkeeping models. Atmospheric CO2 concentration is measured directly, and its growth rate (GATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO2 sink (SOCEAN) is estimated with global ocean biogeochemistry models and observation-based data products. The terrestrial CO2 sink (SLAND) is estimated with dynamic global vegetation models. The resulting carbon budget imbalance (BIM), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1σ. For the year 2021, EFOS increased by 5.1 % relative to 2020, with fossil emissions at 10.1 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 (9.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 when the cement carbonation sink is included), and ELUC was 1.1 ± 0.7 GtC yr−1, for a total anthropogenic CO2 emission (including the cement carbonation sink) of 10.9 ± 0.8 GtC yr−1 (40.0 ± 2.9 GtCO2). Also, for 2021, GATM was 5.2 ± 0.2 GtC yr−1 (2.5 ± 0.1 ppm yr−1), SOCEAN was 2.9  ± 0.4 GtC yr−1, and SLAND was 3.5 ± 0.9 GtC yr−1, with a BIM of −0.6 GtC yr−1 (i.e. the total estimated sources were too low or sinks were too high). The global atmospheric CO2 concentration averaged over 2021 reached 414.71 ± 0.1 ppm. Preliminary data for 2022 suggest an increase in EFOS relative to 2021 of +1.0 % (0.1 % to 1.9 %) globally and atmospheric CO2 concentration reaching 417.2 ppm, more than 50 % above pre-industrial levels (around 278 ppm). Overall, the mean and trend in the components of the global carbon budget are consistently estimated over the period 1959–2021, but discrepancies of up to 1 GtC yr−1 persist for the representation of annual to semi-decadal variability in CO2 fluxes. Comparison of estimates from multiple approaches and observations shows (1) a persistent large uncertainty in the estimate of land-use change emissions, (2) a low agreement between the different methods on the magnitude of the land CO2 flux in the northern extratropics, and (3) a discrepancy between the different methods on the strength of the ocean sink over the last decade. This living data update documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new global carbon budget and the progress in understanding of the global carbon cycle compared with previous publications of this data set. The data presented in this work are available at https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2022 (Friedlingstein et al., 2022b).

Funder

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Fondation BNP Paribas

Tula Foundation

National Natural Science Foundation of China

China Association for Science and Technology

European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

European Space Agency

Flotte Océanographique Française

Institut national des sciences de l'Univers

Institut Polaire Français Paul Emile Victor

Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer

Institut de Recherche pour le Développement

Sorbonne Université

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Helmholtz Association

Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan

Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency

Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation

Norges Forskningsråd

Sveriges Meteorologiska och Hydrologiska Institut

Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas

UK Research and Innovation

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

U.S. Department of Energy

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

National Center for Atmospheric Research

National Science Foundation

Universität Bremen

University of East Anglia

Bureau of Indian Affairs

Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School

Chinese Academy of Sciences

Royal Society

Marine Institute

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung

Publisher

Copernicus GmbH

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Cited by 453 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3