Measuring prairie snow water equivalent with combined UAV-borne gamma spectrometry and lidar
-
Published:2024-07-23
Issue:7
Volume:18
Page:3277-3295
-
ISSN:1994-0424
-
Container-title:The Cryosphere
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:The Cryosphere
Author:
Harder PhillipORCID, Helgason Warren D.ORCID, Pomeroy John W.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Despite decades of effort, there remains an inability to measure snow water equivalent (SWE) at high spatial resolutions using remote sensing. Passive gamma ray spectrometry is one of the only well-established methods to reliably remotely sense SWE, but airborne applications to date have been limited to observing kilometre-scale areal averages. Noting the increasing capabilities of unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAVs) and miniaturization of passive gamma ray spectrometers, this study tested the ability of a UAV-borne gamma spectrometer and concomitant UAV-borne lidar to quantify the spatial variability of SWE at high spatial resolutions. Gamma and lidar observations from a UAV (UAV-gamma and UAV-lidar) were collected over two seasons from shallow, wind-blown, prairie snowpacks in Saskatchewan, Canada, with validation data collected from manual snow depth and density observations. A fine-resolution (0.25 m) reference dataset of SWE, to test UAV-gamma methods, was developed from UAV-lidar snow depth and snow survey snow density observations. The ability of UAV-gamma to resolve the areal average and spatial variability of SWE was promising with appropriate flight characteristics. Survey flights flown at a velocity of 5 m s−1, altitude of 15 m, and line spacing of 15 m were unable to capture the average or spatial variability of SWE within the uncertainty of the reference dataset. Slower, lower, and denser flight lines at a velocity of 4 m s−1, altitude of 8 m, and line spacing of 8 m were able to successfully observe areal average SWE and its variability at spatial resolutions greater than 22.5 m. Using a combination of UAV-based gamma SWE and UAV-based lidar snow depth improved the spatial representation of SWE substantially and permitted estimation of SWE at a spatial resolution 0.25 m with a ± 14.3 mm error relative to the reference SWE dataset. UAV-borne gamma spectrometry to estimate SWE is a promising and novel technique that has the potential to improve the measurement of shallow prairie snowpacks, and when combined with UAV-borne lidar snow depths, can provide fine-resolution, high-accuracy estimates of prairie SWE. Research on optimal hardware, data processing, and interpolation techniques is called for to further improve this remote sensing product and explore its application in other environments.
Funder
Canada First Research Excellence Fund Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Western Economic Diversification Canada Canada Foundation for Innovation
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference55 articles.
1. Bühler, Y., Adams, M. S., Bösch, R., and Stoffel, A.: Mapping snow depth in alpine terrain with unmanned aerial systems (UASs): potential and limitations, The Cryosphere, 10, 1075–1088, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1075-2016, 2016. 2. Carroll, S. S. and Carroll, T. R.: Effect of uneven snow cover on airborne snow water equivalent estimates obtained by measuring terrestrial gamma radiation, Water Resour. Res., 25, 1505–1510, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR025i007p01505, 1989. 3. Carroll, T.: Airborne Gamma Radiation Snow Survey Program: A User's Guide, Version 5. 0, National Operation Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center, Chanhassen, Minnesota, 14 pp., https://www.nohrsc.noaa.gov/technology/pdf/tom_gamma50.pdf (last access: 16 July 2024), 2001. 4. Cho, E., Jacobs, J. M., and Vuyovich, C. M.: The Value of Long-Term (40 years) Airborne Gamma Radiation SWE Record for Evaluating Three Observation-Based Gridded SWE Data Sets by Seasonal Snow and Land Cover Classifications, Water Resour. Res., 56, 23, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025813, 2019. 5. Cho, E., Jacobs, J. M., Schroeder, R., Tuttle, S. E., and Olheiser, C.: Improvement of operational airborne gamma radiation snow water equivalent estimates using SMAP soil moisture, Remote Sens. Environ., 240, 111668, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111668, 2020.
|
|