Unusually low ozone, HCl, and HNO<sub>3</sub> column measurements at Eureka, Canada during winter/spring 2011
Author:
Lindenmaier R.,Strong K.,Batchelor R. L.,Chipperfield M. P.,Daffer W. H.,Drummond J. R.,Duck T. J.,Fast H.,Feng W.,Fogal P. F.,Kolonjari F.,Manney G. L.,Manson A.,Meek C.,Mittermeier R. L.,Nott G. J.,Perro C.,Walker K. A.
Abstract
Abstract. As a consequence of dynamically variable meteorological conditions, springtime Arctic ozone levels exhibit significant interannual variability in the lower stratosphere. In winter 2011, the polar vortex was strong and cold for an unusually long time. Our research site, located at Eureka, Nunavut, Canada (80.05° N, 86.42° W), was mostly inside the vortex from October 2010 until late March 2011. The Bruker 125HR Fourier transform infrared spectrometer installed at the Polar Environment Atmospheric Research Laboratory at Eureka acquired measurements from 23 February to 6 April during the 2011 Canadian Arctic Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Validation Campaign. These measurements showed unusually low ozone, HCl, and HNO3 total columns compared to the previous 14 yr. To remove dynamical effects, we normalized these total columns by the HF total column. The normalized values of the ozone, HCl, and HNO3 total columns were smaller than those from previous years, and confirmed the occurrence of chlorine activation and chemical ozone depletion. To quantify the chemical ozone loss, a three-dimensional chemical transport model, SLIMCAT, and the passive subtraction method were used. The chemical ozone depletion was calculated as the mean percentage difference between the measured ozone and the SLIMCAT passive ozone, and was found to be 35%.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference87 articles.
1. Batchelor, R. L., Strong, K., Lindenmaier, R., Mittermeier, R. L., Fast, H., Drummond, J. R., and Fogal, P. F.: A new Bruker IFS 125HR FTIR spectrometer for the Polar Environment Atmospheric Research Laboratory at Eureka, Canada-measurements and comparison with the existing Bomem DA8 spectrometer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 26, 1328–1340, 2009. 2. Batchelor, R. L., Kolonjari, F., Lindenmaier, R., Mittermeier, R. L., Daffer, W., Fast, H., Manney, G., Strong, K., and Walker, K. A.: Four Fourier transform spectrometers and the Arctic polar vortex: instrument intercomparison and ACE-FTS validation at Eureka during the IPY springs of 2007 and 2008, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 51–66, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-51-2010, 2010. 3. Bojkov, R. D., Bishop, L., and Fioletov, V. E.: Total ozone trends from quality-controlled ground-based data (1964–1994), J. Geophys. Res., 100, 25867–25876, 1995. 4. Chipperfield, M. P.: New version of the TOMCAT/SLIMCAT off-line chemical transport model: intercomparison of stratospheric tracer experiments, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 132, 1179–1203, 2006. 5. Chipperfield, M. P. and Jones, R. L.: Relative influences of atmospheric chemistry and transport on Arctic ozone trends, Nature, 400, 551–554, 1999.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|