The formaldehyde budget as seen by a global-scale multi-constraint and multi-species inversion system
Author:
Fortems-Cheiney A.,Chevallier F.,Pison I.,Bousquet P.,Saunois M.,Szopa S.,Cressot C.,Kurosu T. P.,Chance K.,Fried A.
Abstract
Abstract. For the first time, carbon monoxide (CO) and formaldehyde (HCHO) satellite retrievals have been used together with methane (CH4) and methyl choloroform (CH3CCl3 or MCF) surface measurements in a complex inversion system. The CO and HCHO are, respectively from MOPITT and OMI instruments. The multi-species and multi-satellite dataset inversion is done for the 2005–2008 period. The robustness of our results is evaluated by comparing our posterior-modeled concentrations with several sets of independent measurements of atmospheric mixing ratios. The inversion results lead to significant changes from the prior to the posterior, in terms of magnitude and seasonality of the CO and CH4 surface fluxes and of the 3-D HCHO production by non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs). The latter is significantly decreased, indicating an overestimation of the biogenic NMVOCs emissions, such as isoprene, in the GEIA inventory. CO and CH4 surface emissions are increased by the inversion, from 1037 to 1409 Tg CO and from 489 to 528 TgCH4 on average for the 2005–2008 period. CH4 emissions present significant interannual variability and a joint CO–CH4 fluxes analysis reveals that tropical biomass burning probably played a role in the recent increase of atmospheric methane.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference75 articles.
1. Abbot, D. S., Palmer, P. I., Martin, R. V., Chance, K. V., Jacob, D. J., and Guenther, A.: Seasonal and interannual variability of North American isoprene emissions as determined by formaldehyde columns measurements from space, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1886, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017336, 2003. 2. Arellano, A., Kasibhatla, P., Giglio, L., Van der Werf, G., and Randerson, J.: Top-down estimates of global CO using MOPITT measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L01104, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018609, 2004. 3. Barkley, M. P., Palmer, P. I., Kunh, U., Kesselmeier, J., Chance, K., Kurosu, T. P., Martin, R. V., Helmig, D., and Guenther, A.: Net ecosystem fluxes of isoprene over South America inferred from Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) observations of HCHO columns, Geophys. Res., 113, D20301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009863, 2008. 4. Bergamaschi, P., Frankenberg, C., Meirink, J. F., Krol, M., Villani, M. G., Houweling, S., Den- tener, F., Dlugokencky, E. J., Miller, J. B., Gatti, L. V., Engel, A., and Levin, I.: Inverse modeling of global and regional CH4 emissions using SCIAMACHY satellite retrievals, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D22301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012287, 2009. 5. Boeke, N. L., Marshall, J. D., Alvarez, S., Chance, K. V., Fried, A., Kurosu, T. P., Rappengluck, B., Richter, D., Walega, J., Weibring, P., and Millet, D. B.: Formaldehyde columns from the ozone monitoring instrument: urban versus background levels and evaluation using aircraft data and a global model, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D05303, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014870, 2011.
|
|