Global warming will largely increase waste treatment CH4 emissions in Chinese megacities: insight from the first city-scale CH4 concentration observation network in Hangzhou, China
-
Published:2023-04-14
Issue:7
Volume:23
Page:4501-4520
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Hu ChengORCID, Zhang Junqing, Qi BingORCID, Du Rongguang, Xu Xiaofei, Xiong Haoyu, Liu Huili, Ai Xinyue, Peng Yiyi, Xiao Wei
Abstract
Abstract. Atmospheric CH4 is the second-largest anthropogenic contributor to
global warming. However, its emissions, components, spatial–temporal
variations and projected changes still remain largely uncertain from city to
national scales. CH4 emissions from waste treatment (including solid
waste landfills, solid waste incineration and sewage) account for
>50 % of total anthropogenic CH4 emissions at the city scale,
and considering the high temperature sensitivity of CH4 emission
factors (EFs) to biological-process-based sources such as waste
treatment, large differences will occur when estimating future CH4
emissions under different global warming scenarios. Furthermore, the
relationships between temperature and waste treatment CH4 emissions
have only been studied in a few site-specific studies and lack representativity for whole cities, which contain various biophysical
conditions and show heterogeneous distribution. The above factors cause
uncertainty in the evaluation of city-scale CH4 emissions (especially
from waste treatments), and projected changes still remain unexplored. Here
we conduct the first tower-based CH4 observation network with three
sites in Hangzhou, which is located in the developed Yangtze River Delta
(YRD) area and ranks as one of the largest megacities in China. We found the
a priori total annual anthropogenic CH4 emissions and those from waste treatment
were overestimated by 36.0 % and 47.1 % in Hangzhou, respectively.
In contrast, the total emissions in the larger region, i.e., Zhejiang
Province or the YRD area, were slightly underestimated by 7.0 %. Emissions
from waste treatment showed obvious seasonal patterns following air
temperature. By using the linear relationship constructed between monthly
waste treatment CH4 emissions and air temperature, we find the waste
treatment EFs increase by 38 %–50 % with temperature
increases of 10 ∘C. Together with projected temperature changes from
four climate change scenarios, the global-warming-induced EFs in Hangzhou will increase at the rates of 2.2 %, 1.2 %, 0.7 % and 0.5 % per
decade for IPCC AR5 (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the Fifth
Assessment Report) RCP (Representative Concentration Pathway) 8.5, RCP6.0,
RCP4.5 and RCP2.6 scenarios, respectively. And the EFs will finally increase
by 17.6 %, 9.6 %, 5.6 % and 4.0 % at the end of this century.
Additionally, the derived relative changes in China also show high
heterogeneity and indicate large uncertainty in projecting future national
total CH4 emissions. Hence, we strongly suggest temperature-dependent EFs and the positive feedback between global warming
and CH4 emissions should be considered in future CH4 emission
projections and climate change models.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province National Key Research and Development Program of China
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference62 articles.
1. Agustí-Panareda, A., Diamantakis, M., Massart, S., Chevallier, F., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Barré, J., Curcoll, R., Engelen, R., Langerock, B., Law, R. M., Loh, Z., Morguí, J. A., Parrington, M., Peuch, V.-H., Ramonet, M., Roehl, C., Vermeulen, A. T., Warneke, T., and Wunch, D.: Modelling CO2 weather – why horizontal resolution matters, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7347–7376, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7347-2019, 2019. 2. Bian, R., Zhang, T., Zhao, F., Chen, J., Liang, C., Li, W., Sun, Y., Chai, X., Fang, X., and Yuan, L.: Greenhouse gas emissions from waste
sectors in China during 2006–2019: Implications for carbon mitigation,
Proc. Saf. Environ., 161, 488–497, 2022. 3. Bloom, A. A., Bowman, K. W., Lee, M., Turner, A. J., Schroeder, R., Worden, J. R., Weidner, R., McDonald, K. C., and Jacob, D. J.: A global wetland methane emissions and uncertainty dataset for atmospheric chemical transport models (WetCHARTs version 1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2141–2156, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2141-2017, 2017. 4. Börjesson, G. and Svensson, B. H.: Seasonal and Diurnal Methane Emissions From a
Landfill and Their Regulation By Methane Oxidation, Waste Manage. Res., 15, 33–54, https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X9701500104, 1997. 5. Cai, B., Liu, J., Zeng, X., Cao, D., Liu, L., Zhou, Y., and Zhang, Z.: Estimation of
CH4 emission from landfill in China based on point emission sources, Adv.
Clim. Change Res., 5, 81–91, 2014.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|