Characterizing the performance of a POPS miniaturized optical particle counter when operated on a quadcopter drone
-
Published:2021-09-16
Issue:9
Volume:14
Page:6101-6118
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Liu Zixia, Osborne Martin, Anderson Karen, Shutler Jamie D., Wilson Andy, Langridge Justin, Yim Steve H. L.ORCID, Coe Hugh, Babu Suresh, Satheesh Sreedharan K., Zuidema PaquitaORCID, Huang TaoORCID, Cheng Jack C. H., Haywood James
Abstract
Abstract. We first validate the performance of the Portable Optical Particle
Spectrometer (POPS), a small light-weight and high sensitivity optical
particle counter, against a reference scanning mobility particle sizer
(SMPS) for a month-long deployment in an environment dominated by biomass
burning aerosols. Subsequently, we examine any biases introduced by
operating the POPS on a quadcopter drone, a DJI Matrice 200 V2. We report
the root mean square difference (RMSD) and mean absolute difference (MAD) in
particle number concentrations (PNCs) when mounted on the UAV and operating
on the ground and when hovering at 10 m. When wind speeds are low (less than 2.6 m s−1), we find only modest differences in the RMSDs and MADs of 5 % and
3 % when operating at 10 m altitude. When wind speeds are between 2.6 and 7.7 m s−1 the RMSDs and MADs increase to 26.2 % and 19.1 %, respectively,
when operating at 10 m altitude. No statistical difference in PNCs was
detected when operating on the UAV in either ascent or descent. We also find
size distributions of aerosols in the accumulation mode (defined by
diameter, d, where 0.1 ≤ d ≤ 1 µm) are relatively consistent
between measurements at the surface and measurements at 10 m altitude, while
differences in the coarse mode (here defined by d > 1 µm)
are universally larger. Our results suggest that the impact of the UAV
rotors on the POPS PNCs are small at low wind speeds, but when operating
under a higher wind speed of up to 7.6 m s−1, larger discrepancies occur. In
addition, it appears that the POPS measures sub-micron aerosol particles
more accurately than super-micron aerosol particles when airborne on the
UAV. These measurements lay the foundations for determining the magnitude of
potential errors that might be introduced into measured aerosol particle
size distributions and concentrations owing to the turbulence created by the
rotors on the UAV.
Funder
Chinese University of Hong Kong University of Exeter Natural Environment Research Council
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference42 articles.
1. Ahn, K.-H.: Aerosol 3D Profiling Using Compact Particle Measuring
Instruments with Balloon and Drone System, in: 7th International Symposium
on Ultrafine Particles, Air Quality and Climate, 15–16 May 2019, Brüssel, Belgium, 2019. 2. Atkinson, D. B., Radney, J. G., Lum, J., Kolesar, K. R., Cziczo, D. J., Pekour, M. S., Zhang, Q., Setyan, A., Zelenyuk, A., and Cappa, C. D.: Aerosol optical hygroscopicity measurements during the 2010 CARES campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 4045–4061, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4045-2015, 2015. 3. Atkinson, D. B., Pekour, M., Chand, D., Radney, J. G., Kolesar, K. R., Zhang, Q., Setyan, A., O'Neill, N. T., and Cappa, C. D.: Using spectral methods to obtain particle size information from optical data: applications to measurements from CARES 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5499–5514, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5499-2018, 2018. 4. Bellouin, N., Boucher, O., Haywood, J., and Reddy, M. S.: Global estimate of
aerosol direct radiative forcing from satellite measurements, Nature, 438,
1138–1141, 2005. 5. Bezantakos, S., Schmidt-Ott, F., and Biskos, G.: Performance evaluation of
the cost-effective and lightweight Alphasense optical particle counter for
use onboard unmanned aerial vehicles, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 52, 385–392,
2018.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|