Assessment of the TROPOMI tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> product based on airborne APEX observations
-
Published:2021-01-28
Issue:1
Volume:14
Page:615-646
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Tack Frederik, Merlaud Alexis, Iordache Marian-Daniel, Pinardi GaiaORCID, Dimitropoulou Ermioni, Eskes HenkORCID, Bomans Bart, Veefkind Pepijn, Van Roozendael Michel
Abstract
Abstract. Sentinel-5 Precursor (S-5P), launched in October 2017, carrying the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) nadir-viewing spectrometer, is the
first mission of the Copernicus Programme dedicated to the monitoring of air quality, climate, and ozone. In the presented study, the TROPOMI
tropospheric nitrogen dioxide (NO2) level-2 (L2) product (OFFL v1.03.01; 3.5 km × 7 km at nadir observations) has been
validated over strongly polluted urban regions by comparison with coincident high-resolution Airborne Prism EXperiment (APEX) remote sensing
observations (∼ 75 m × 120 m). Satellite products can be optimally assessed based on (APEX) airborne remote sensing
observations, as a large amount of satellite pixels can be fully mapped at high accuracy and in a relatively short time interval, reducing the impact
of spatiotemporal mismatches. In the framework of the S-5P validation campaign over Belgium (S5PVAL-BE), the APEX imaging spectrometer has been deployed during four mapping
flights (26–29 June 2019) over the two largest urban regions in Belgium, i.e. Brussels and Antwerp, in order to map the horizontal distribution of
tropospheric NO2. For each flight, 10 to 20 TROPOMI pixels were fully covered by approximately 2700 to 4000 APEX measurements within each
TROPOMI pixel. The TROPOMI and APEX NO2 vertical column density (VCD) retrieval schemes are similar in concept. Overall, for the ensemble
of the four flights, the standard TROPOMI NO2 VCD product is well correlated (R = 0.92) but biased negatively by
−1.2 ± 1.2 × 1015 molec cm−2 or −14 ± 12 %, on average, with respect to coincident APEX
NO2 retrievals. When replacing the coarse 1∘ × 1∘ the massively parallel (MP) version of the Tracer Model version 5 (TM5)
a priori NO2 profiles by NO2 profile
shapes from the Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service (CAMS) regional chemistry transport model (CTM) ensemble at
0.1∘ × 0.1∘, R is 0.94 and the slope increases from 0.82 to 0.93. The bias
is reduced to −0.1 ± 1.0 × 1015 molec cm−2 or −1.0 ± 12 %. The absolute difference is on average
1.3 × 1015 molec cm−2 (16 %) and 0.7 × 1015 molec cm−2 (9 %), when comparing APEX
NO2 VCDs with TM5-MP-based and CAMS-based NO2 VCDs, respectively. Both sets of retrievals are well within the mission accuracy
requirement of a maximum bias of 25 %–50 % for the TROPOMI tropospheric NO2 product for all individual compared pixels. Additionally,
the APEX data set allows the study of TROPOMI subpixel variability and impact of signal smoothing due to its finite satellite pixel size, typically
coarser than fine-scale gradients in the urban NO2 field. For a case study in the Antwerp region, the current TROPOMI data underestimate
localized enhancements and overestimate background values by approximately 1–2 × 1015 molec cm−2 (10 %–20 %).
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference77 articles.
1. Anderson, G., Clough, S., Kneizys, F., Chetwynd, J., and Shettle, E.:
AFGL atmospheric constituent profiles (0–120 km),
Hanscom AFB, MA: Optical Physics Division, Air Force Geophysics Laboratory, AFGL-TR, 86-0110, US Air Force Geophysics Laboratory, Optical Physics Division, 1, 1986. 2. Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., and Brinksma, E. J.:
Error analysis for tropospheric NO2 retrieval from space,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
109, D04311, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003962, 2004. 3. Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., Dirksen, R. J., van der A, R. J., Veefkind, J. P., Stammes, P., Huijnen, V., Kleipool, Q. L., Sneep, M., Claas, J., Leitão, J., Richter, A., Zhou, Y., and Brunner, D.: An improved tropospheric NO2 column retrieval algorithm for the Ozone Monitoring Instrument, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1905–1928, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1905-2011, 2011. 4. Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., Richter, A., De Smedt, I., Lorente, A., Beirle, S., van Geffen, J. H. G. M., Zara, M., Peters, E., Van Roozendael, M., Wagner, T., Maasakkers, J. D., van der A, R. J., Nightingale, J., De Rudder, A., Irie, H., Pinardi, G., Lambert, J.-C., and Compernolle, S. C.: Improving algorithms and uncertainty estimates for satellite NO2 retrievals: results from the quality assurance for the essential climate variables (QA4ECV) project, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 6651–6678, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6651-2018, 2018. 5. Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J. P., Buchwitz, M., Frerick, J., Noël, S., Rozanov, V. V., Chance, K. V., and Goede, A. P. H.:
SCIAMACHY: Mission Objectives and Measurement Modes,
J. Amos Sci.,
56, 127–150, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520- 0469(1999)056<0127:SMOAMM>2.0.CO;2, 1999.
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|