Global Carbon Budget 2021
-
Published:2022-04-26
Issue:4
Volume:14
Page:1917-2005
-
ISSN:1866-3516
-
Container-title:Earth System Science Data
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Earth Syst. Sci. Data
Author:
Friedlingstein PierreORCID, Jones Matthew W., O'Sullivan MichaelORCID, Andrew Robbie M.ORCID, Bakker Dorothee C. E.ORCID, Hauck JudithORCID, Le Quéré CorinneORCID, Peters Glen P.ORCID, Peters WouterORCID, Pongratz JuliaORCID, Sitch Stephen, Canadell Josep G.ORCID, Ciais PhilippeORCID, Jackson Rob B.ORCID, Alin Simone R.ORCID, Anthoni PeterORCID, Bates Nicholas R., Becker MeikeORCID, Bellouin NicolasORCID, Bopp LaurentORCID, Chau Thi Tuyet TrangORCID, Chevallier FrédéricORCID, Chini Louise P.ORCID, Cronin Margot, Currie Kim I., Decharme BertrandORCID, Djeutchouang Laique M., Dou XinyuORCID, Evans WileyORCID, Feely Richard A., Feng Liang, Gasser ThomasORCID, Gilfillan Dennis, Gkritzalis Thanos, Grassi Giacomo, Gregor LukeORCID, Gruber NicolasORCID, Gürses ÖzgürORCID, Harris Ian, Houghton Richard A.ORCID, Hurtt George C.ORCID, Iida YosukeORCID, Ilyina TatianaORCID, Luijkx Ingrid T.ORCID, Jain AtulORCID, Jones Steve D.ORCID, Kato EtsushiORCID, Kennedy Daniel, Klein Goldewijk KeesORCID, Knauer JürgenORCID, Korsbakken Jan IvarORCID, Körtzinger ArneORCID, Landschützer PeterORCID, Lauvset Siv K.ORCID, Lefèvre Nathalie, Lienert Sebastian, Liu JunjieORCID, Marland Gregg, McGuire Patrick C.ORCID, Melton Joe R.ORCID, Munro David R.ORCID, Nabel Julia E. M. S.ORCID, Nakaoka Shin-IchiroORCID, Niwa Yosuke, Ono Tsuneo, Pierrot DenisORCID, Poulter BenjaminORCID, Rehder GregorORCID, Resplandy Laure, Robertson Eddy, Rödenbeck ChristianORCID, Rosan Thais M.ORCID, Schwinger JörgORCID, Schwingshackl ClemensORCID, Séférian RolandORCID, Sutton Adrienne J.ORCID, Sweeney ColmORCID, Tanhua TosteORCID, Tans Pieter P., Tian HanqinORCID, Tilbrook BronteORCID, Tubiello FrancescoORCID, van der Werf Guido R., Vuichard Nicolas, Wada Chisato, Wanninkhof Rik, Watson Andrew J.ORCID, Willis David, Wiltshire Andrew J., Yuan Wenping, Yue ChaoORCID, Yue XuORCID, Zaehle SönkeORCID, Zeng Jiye
Abstract
Abstract. Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and
their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere
in a changing climate is critical to better understand the global carbon
cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future
climate change. Here we describe and synthesize datasets and methodology to
quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their
uncertainties. Fossil CO2 emissions (EFOS) are based on energy
statistics and cement production data, while emissions from land-use change
(ELUC), mainly deforestation, are based on land use and land-use change
data and bookkeeping models. Atmospheric CO2 concentration is measured
directly, and its growth rate (GATM) is computed from the annual
changes in concentration. The ocean CO2 sink (SOCEAN) is estimated
with global ocean biogeochemistry models and observation-based
data products. The terrestrial CO2 sink (SLAND) is estimated with
dynamic global vegetation models. The resulting carbon budget imbalance
(BIM), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the
estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a
measure of imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon
cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1σ. For the first
time, an approach is shown to reconcile the difference in our ELUC
estimate with the one from national greenhouse gas inventories, supporting
the assessment of collective countries' climate progress. For the year 2020, EFOS declined by 5.4 % relative to 2019, with
fossil emissions at 9.5 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 (9.3 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 when the cement carbonation sink is included), and ELUC was 0.9 ± 0.7 GtC yr−1, for a total anthropogenic CO2 emission of
10.2 ± 0.8 GtC yr−1 (37.4 ± 2.9 GtCO2). Also, for
2020, GATM was 5.0 ± 0.2 GtC yr−1 (2.4 ± 0.1 ppm yr−1), SOCEAN was 3.0 ± 0.4 GtC yr−1, and SLAND
was 2.9 ± 1 GtC yr−1, with a BIM of −0.8 GtC yr−1. The
global atmospheric CO2 concentration averaged over 2020 reached 412.45 ± 0.1 ppm. Preliminary data for 2021 suggest a rebound in EFOS
relative to 2020 of +4.8 % (4.2 % to 5.4 %) globally. Overall, the mean and trend in the components of the global carbon budget
are consistently estimated over the period 1959–2020, but discrepancies of
up to 1 GtC yr−1 persist for the representation of annual to
semi-decadal variability in CO2 fluxes. Comparison of estimates from
multiple approaches and observations shows (1) a persistent large
uncertainty in the estimate of land-use changes emissions, (2) a low
agreement between the different methods on the magnitude of the land
CO2 flux in the northern extra-tropics, and (3) a discrepancy between
the different methods on the strength of the ocean sink over the last
decade. This living data update documents changes in the methods and datasets used in this new global carbon budget and the progress in understanding
of the global carbon cycle compared with previous publications of this dataset (Friedlingstein et al., 2020, 2019; Le
Quéré et al., 2018b, a, 2016, 2015b, a, 2014, 2013). The
data presented in this work are available at https://doi.org/10.18160/gcp-2021 (Friedlingstein et al., 2021).
Funder
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Fondation BNP Paribas Tula Foundation National Natural Science Foundation of China Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Horizon 2020 European Space Agency Institut de Recherche pour le Développement Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GEOMAR Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel Helmholtz Association Marine Institute Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation National Aeronautics and Space Administration Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Norges Forskningsråd Department of Science and Innovation, South Africa National Research Foundation Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung Royal Society National Centre for Atmospheric Science Natural Environment Research Council Newton Fund U.S. Department of Commerce U.S. Department of Energy National Science Foundation Princeton Environmental Institute, Princeton University
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference332 articles.
1. Ahlström, A., Raupach, M. R., Schurgers, G., Smith, B., Arneth, A.,
Jung, M., Reichstein, M., Canadell, J. G., Friedlingstein, P., Jain, A. K.,
Kato, E., Poulter, B., Sitch, S., Stocker, B. D., Viovy, N., Wang, Y. P.,
Wiltshire, A., Zaehle, S., and Zeng, N.: The dominant role of semi-arid
ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO2 sink, Science, 348, 895–899,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1668, 2015. 2. Amador-Jiménez, M., Millner, N., Palmer, C., Pennington, R. T., and
Sileci, L.: The Unintended Impact of Colombia's Covid-19 Lockdown on Forest
Fires, Environ. Resource Econ., 76, 1081–1105,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00501-5, 2020. 3. Amante, C. and Eakins, B. W.: ETOPO1 Global Relief Model converted to PanMap
layer format, PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.769615, 2009. 4. Andela, N., Morton, D. C., Giglio, L., Chen, Y., van der Werf, G. R.,
Kasibhatla, P. S., DeFries, R. S., Collatz, G. J., Hantson, S., Kloster, S.,
Bachelet, D., Forrest, M., Lasslop, G., Li, F., Mangeon, S., Melton, J. R.,
Yue, C., and Randerson, J. T.: A human-driven decline in global burned area,
Science, 356, 1356–1362, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4108, 2017. 5. Andres, R. J., Boden, T. A., Bréon, F.-M., Ciais, P., Davis, S., Erickson, D., Gregg, J. S., Jacobson, A., Marland, G., Miller, J., Oda, T., Olivier, J. G. J., Raupach, M. R., Rayner, P., and Treanton, K.: A synthesis of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel combustion, Biogeosciences, 9, 1845–1871, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-1845-2012, 2012.
Cited by
950 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|