Global drought and severe drought-affected populations in 1.5 and 2 °C warmer worlds
-
Published:2018-03-19
Issue:1
Volume:9
Page:267-283
-
ISSN:2190-4987
-
Container-title:Earth System Dynamics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Earth Syst. Dynam.
Author:
Liu WenbinORCID, Sun Fubao, Lim Wee HoORCID, Zhang Jie, Wang HongORCID, Shiogama Hideo, Zhang Yuqing
Abstract
Abstract. The 2015 Paris Agreement proposed a more ambitious climate change
mitigation target on limiting global warming to 1.5 ∘C instead of
2 ∘C above preindustrial levels. Scientific investigations on
environmental risks associated with these warming targets are necessary to
inform climate policymaking. Based on the Coupled Model
Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5) climate models, we present the first risk-based
assessment of changes in global drought and the impact of severe drought on
populations from additional 1.5 and 2 ∘C warming conditions. Our
results highlight the risk of drought on a global scale and in several hotspot
regions such as the Amazon, northeastern Brazil, southern Africa and Central Europe
at both 1.5 and 2 ∘C global warming relative to the historical
period, showing increases in drought durations from 2.9 to 3.2 months. Correspondingly, more total and urban populations would be exposed to
severe droughts globally (+132.5 ± 216.2 million and
+194.5 ± 276.5 million total population and +350.2 ± 158.8 million
and +410.7 ± 213.5 million urban populations in 1.5 and
2 ∘C warmer worlds) and regionally (e.g., East Africa, West
Africa and South Asia). Less rural populations (−217.7 ± 79.2 million
and −216.2 ± 82.4 million rural populations in 1.5 and 2 ∘C
warmer worlds) would be exposed to severe drought globally under
climate warming, population growth and especially the urbanization-induced
population migration. By keeping global warming at 1.5 ∘C above the
preindustrial levels instead of 2 ∘C, there is a decrease in drought risks
(i.e., less drought duration, less drought intensity and severity but
relatively more frequent drought) and the affected total, urban and
rural populations would decrease globally and in most regions. While
challenging for both East Africa and South Asia, the benefits of limiting
warming to below 1.5 ∘C in terms of global drought risk and impact
reduction are significant.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference57 articles.
1. Aghakouchat, A., Cheng L., Mazdiyasni, O., and Farahmand, A.: Global warming
and changes in risk of concurrent climate extremes: insights from the
2014 California drought, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 8847–8852, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062308, 2015. 2. Allen, R., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration
guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage
paper 56, FAO – Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 1998. 3. Ault, T. R., Mankin, J. S., Cook, B. I., and Smerdon, J. E.: Relative impacts
of mitigation, temperature, and precipitation on 21st-century megadrought
risk in the American Southwest, Sci. Adv., 2, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600873, 2016. 4. Ayantobo, O. O., Li, Y., Song, S. B., and Yao, N.: Spatial comparability of
drought characteristics and related return periods in mainland China over 1961–2013,
J. Hydrol., 550, 549–567, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.05.019, 2017. 5. Cheng, L., Hoerling, M., Aghakouchak, A., Livneh, B., Quan, X. W., and Eischeid,
J.: How has human-induced climate change affected California drought risk?, J.
Climate, 29, 111–120, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0260.1, 2016.
Cited by
139 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|