Global and regional hydrological impacts of global forest expansion
-
Published:2024-09-03
Issue:17
Volume:21
Page:3883-3902
-
ISSN:1726-4189
-
Container-title:Biogeosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biogeosciences
Author:
King James A.ORCID, Weber JamesORCID, Lawrence Peter, Roe Stephanie, Swann Abigail L. S.ORCID, Val Martin MariaORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Large-scale reforestation, afforestation, and forest restoration schemes have gained global support as climate change mitigation strategies due to their significant carbon dioxide removal (CDR) potential. However, there has been limited research into the unintended consequences of forestation from a biophysical perspective. In the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2), we apply a global forestation scenario, within a Paris Agreement-compatible warming scenario, to investigate the land surface and hydroclimate response. Compared to a control scenario where land use is fixed to present-day levels, the forestation scenario is up to 2 °C cooler at low latitudes by 2100, driven by a 10 % increase in evaporative cooling in forested areas. However, afforested areas where grassland or shrubland are replaced lead to a doubling of plant water demand in some tropical regions, causing significant decreases in soil moisture (∼ 5 % globally, 5 %–10 % regionally) and water availability (∼ 10 % globally, 10 %–15 % regionally) in regions with increased forest cover. While there are some increases in low cloud and seasonal precipitation over the expanded tropical forests, with enhanced negative cloud radiative forcing, the impacts on large-scale precipitation and atmospheric circulation are limited. This contrasts with the precipitation response to simulated large-scale deforestation found in previous studies. The forestation scenario demonstrates local cooling benefits without major disruption to global hydrodynamics beyond those already projected to result from climate change, in addition to the cooling associated with CDR. However, the water demands of extensive forestation, especially afforestation, have implications for its viability, given the uncertainty in future precipitation changes.
Funder
UK Research and Innovation Biological and Environmental Research
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference104 articles.
1. Abiodun, B. J., Salami, A. T., Matthew, O. J., and Odedokun, S.: Potential impacts of afforestation on climate change and extreme events in Nigeria, Clim. Dynam., 41, 277–293, https://doi.org/10.1007/S00382-012-1523-9, 2013. 2. Alkama, R. and Cescatti, A.: Biophysical climate impacts of recent changes in global forest cover, Science, 351, 600–604, https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.AAC8083, 2016. 3. Baker, J. C. A. and Spracklen, D. V.: Divergent Representation of Precipitation Recycling in the Amazon and the Congo in CMIP6 Models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2021GL095136, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095136, 2022. 4. Bala, G., Caldeira, K., Wickett, M., Phillips, T. J., Lobell, D. B., Delire, C., and Mirin, A.: Combined climate and carbon-cycle effects of large-scale deforestation, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 6550–6555, https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.0608998104, 2007. 5. Barnes, M. L., Zhang, Q., Robeson, S. M., Young, L., Burakowski, E. A., Oishi, A. C., Stoy, P. C., Katul, G., and Novick, K. A.: A Century of Reforestation Reduced Anthropogenic Warming in the Eastern United States, Earths Future, 12, e2023EF003663, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF003663, 2024.
|
|