Modelling of multi-lateral well geometries for geothermal applications
-
Published:2018-08-28
Issue:
Volume:45
Page:209-215
-
ISSN:1680-7359
-
Container-title:Advances in Geosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Adv. Geosci.
Author:
Peters Elisabeth, Blöcher Guido, Salimzadeh SaeedORCID, Egberts Paul J. P., Cacace MauroORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Well inflow modelling in different numerical simulation
approaches are compared for a multi-lateral well. Specifically radial wells
will be investigated, which can be created using Radial Jet Drilling (RJD).
In this technique, powerful hydraulic jets are used to create small diameter
laterals (25–50 mm) of limited length (up to 100 m) from a well. The
laterals, also called radials, leave the backbone at a 90∘ angle. In
this study we compare three numerical simulators and a semi-analytical tool
for calculating inflow of a radial well. The numerical simulators are FE
approaches (CSMP and GOLEM) and an FV approach with explicit well model
(Eclipse®). A series of increasingly complex
well configurations is simulated, including one with inflow from a fault.
Although all simulators generally are reasonably close in terms of the total
well flow (deviations < 4 % for the homogeneous cases), the
distribution of the flow over the different parts of the well can vary
significantly. Also, the FE approaches are more sensitive to grid size when
the flow is dominated by radial flow to the well since they do not include a
dedicated well model. In the FE approaches, lower dimensional elements (1-D
for the well and 2-D for the faults) were superimposed into a 3-D space. In
case the flow is dominated by fracture flow, the results from the FV approach
in Eclipse deviates from the FE methods.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference19 articles.
1. Balay, S., Abhyankar. S., Adams, M. F., Brown, J., Brune, P., Buschelman, K.,
Dalcin, L., Eijkhout, V., Gropp, W. D., Kaushik, D., Knepley, M. G., May, D. A.,
Curfman McInnes, L., Tran Mills, R., Munson, T., Rupp, K., Sanan, P., Smith,
B. F., Zampini, S., and Zhang, H.: PETSc Users manual, Tech. rep., ANL-95/11
– Revision 3, Argonne National Laboratory, available at:
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc (last access: 27 August 2018), 2008. 2. Blöcher, M. G., Zimmermann, G., Moeck, I., Brandt, W., Hassanzadegan, A.,
and Magri F.: 3D numerical modeling of hydrothermal processes during the
lifetime of a deep geothermal reservoir, Geofluids, 10, 406–421, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-8123.2010.00284.x, 2010. 3. Blöcher, G., Cacace, M., Reinsch, T., and Watanabe, N.: Evaluation of
three exploitation concepts for a deep geothermal system in the North German
Basin, Comp. Geosci., 82, 120–129, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2015.06.005, 2015. 4. Cacace, M. and Jacquey, A. B.: Flexible parallel implicit modelling of coupled
thermal-hydraulic-mechanical processes in fractured rocks, Solid Earth, 8,
921–941, doi10.5194/se-8-921-2017, 2017. 5. Egberts, P. J. P. and Peters, E.:A Fast Simulation Tool for Evaluation of
Novel Well Stimulation Techniques for Tight Gas Reservoirs, Society of
Petroleum Engineers, https://doi.org/10.2118/174289-MS, 2015.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|