Carbon in global waste and wastewater flows – its potential as energy source under alternative future waste management regimes
-
Published:2018-08-09
Issue:
Volume:45
Page:105-113
-
ISSN:1680-7359
-
Container-title:Advances in Geosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Adv. Geosci.
Author:
Gómez-Sanabria Adriana, Höglund-Isaksson LenaORCID, Rafaj Peter, Schöpp WolfgangORCID
Abstract
Abstract. This study provides a quantification of the maximum energy that
can be generated from global waste and wastewater sectors in the timeframe
to 2050, as well as of the potential limitations introduced by different
future waste and wastewater management regimes. Results show that
considerable amounts of carbon are currently stored in waste materials
without being recovered for recycling or made available for energy
generation. Future levels of energy recovery when maintaining current states
of waste and wastewater management systems are contrasted with those that
can be attained under a circular system identified here as a system with
successful implementation of food and plastic waste reduction policies,
maximum recycling rates of all different types of waste streams, and once
the recycling capacity is exhausted, incineration of remaining materials to
produce energy. Moreover, biogas is assumed to be produced from anaerobic
co-digestion of food and garden wastes, animal manure, and anaerobically
treated wastewater. Finally, we explore the limits for energy generation
from waste and wastewater sources should the efficiency of energy recovery
be pushed further through development of existing technology. We find that
global implementation of such an ideal system could increase the relative
contribution of waste and wastewater sources to global energy demand from 2 %
to 9 % by 2040, corresponding to a maximum energy potential of 64 EJ
per year. This would however require widespread adoption of policies and
infrastructure that stimulate and allow for large-scale waste prevention and
separation, as well as highly advanced treatment processes. Giving priority
to such efforts would enable circularity of the waste-energy system.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference38 articles.
1. Berglund, M. and Börjesson, P.: Assessment of energy performance in the life-cycle of biogas production, Biomass Bioenerg., 30, 254–266, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.11.011, 2006. 2. Bogner, J., Pipatti, R., Hashimoto, S., Diaz, C., Mareckova, K., Diaz, L., Kjeldsen, P., Monni, S., Faaij, A., Gao, Q., Zhang, T., Abdelrafie Ahmed, M., Sutamihardja, R. T. M., and Gregory, R.: Mitigation of Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Waste: Conclusions and Strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report, Working Group III (Mitigation), 2008. 3. Cakir, F. Y. and Stenstrom, M. K.: Greenhouse gas production: A comparison between aerobic and anaerobic wastewater treatment technology, Water Research, 39, 4197–4203, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.07.042, 2005. 4. Corsten, M., Worrell, E., Rouw, M., and van Duin, A.: The potential contribution of sustainable waste management to energy use and greenhouse gas emission reduction in the Netherlands, Resour. Conserv. Recy., 77, 13–21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.04.002, 2013. 5. Demirbas, A.: Combustion characteristics of different biomass fuels, Prog. Energ. Combust., 30, 219–230, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2003.10.004, 2004.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|