Uncertainty in simulated streamflow using runoff driven by the outputs of a high-resolution regional climate model
-
Published:2024-04-19
Issue:
Volume:386
Page:75-79
-
ISSN:2199-899X
-
Container-title:Proceedings of IAHS
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Proc. IAHS
Author:
Tinumbang Aulia Febianda Anwar, Yorozu Kazuaki, Tachikawa YasutoORCID, Ichikawa Yutaka, Sasaki Hidetaka, Nakaegawa Tosiyuki
Abstract
Abstract. Estimating river discharge using climate model output can aid in analyzing the potential impacts of climate change on water-related disasters. This study aimed to explore the uncertainty in simulated streamflow using the non-hydrostatic regional climate model (NHRCM) outputs in Thailand. The NHRCM was simulated at 5- and 2 km resolutions. To estimate runoff, two land surface models (LSMs) were employed: the Meteorological Research Institute–Simple Biosphere Model (MRI-SiB) in NHRCM and the Simple Biosphere including Urban Canopy (SiBUC). The NHRCM rainfalls captured the seasonal pattern of rainfall in the upper Ping River Basin, although they were underestimated. The 2 km NHRCM had less rainfall, but it captured the local topography better than the 5 km model. This difference in rainfall affected the simulated streamflow. Furthermore, the uncertainty of the simulated streamflow was influenced by the different runoff schemes used by the LSMs. For instance, MRI-SiB incorporates a direct infiltration structure from the surface to the second soil layer and estimates subsurface runoff using hydraulic diffusion and gravitational flow, while SiBUC uses a gravitational-only subsurface runoff approach. These variations led to significant disparities in surface and subsurface runoff. Future work should enhance the accuracy of rainfall from climate models and runoff from LSMs for assessing the potential impacts of climate change on water-related disasters.
Funder
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Japan Science and Technology Agency
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference12 articles.
1. Beck, H. E., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., de Roo, A., Dutra, E., Fink, G., Orth, R., and Schellekens, J.: Global evaluation of runoff from 10 state-of-the-art hydrological models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2881–2903, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2881-2017, 2017. 2. Funk, C., Peterson, P., Landsfeld, M., Pedreros, D., Verdin, J., Shukla, S., Husak, G., Rowland, J., Harrison, L., Hoell, A., and Michaelsen, J.: The climate hazards infrared precipitation with stations-a new environmental record for monitoring extremes, Sci. Data, 2, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.66, 2015. 3. Haddeland, I., Clark, D. B., Franssen, W., Ludwig, F., Voß, F., Arnell, N. W., Bertrand, N., Best, M., Folwell, S., Gerten, D., Gomes, S., Gosling, S. N., Hagemann, S., Hanasaki, N., Harding, R., Heinke, J., Kabat, P., Koirala, S., Oki, T., Polcher, J., Stacke, T., Viterbo, P., Weedon, G. P., and Yeh, P.: Multimodel estimate of the global terrestrial water balance: setup and first results. J. Hydrometeor., 12, 869–884, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JHM1324.1, 2011. 4. Hirabayashi, Y., Tanoue, M., Sasaki, Xudong, Z., and Yamazaki, D.: Global exposure to flooding from the new CMIP6 climate model projections, Sci. Rep., 11, 3740, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83279-w, 2021. 5. Hirai, M., Sakashita, T., Kitagawa, H., Tsuyuki, T., Hosaka, M., and Oh'izumi, M.: Development and Validation of a New Land Surface Model for JMA's Operational Global Model Using the CEOP Observation Dataset, J. Meteor. Soc. Jpn., 85A, 1–24, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.85A.1, 2007.
|
|