Rapid post-earthquake modelling of coseismic landslide intensity and distribution for emergency response decision support
-
Published:2017-09-15
Issue:9
Volume:17
Page:1521-1540
-
ISSN:1684-9981
-
Container-title:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Robinson Tom R.ORCID, Rosser Nicholas J., Densmore Alexander L.ORCID, Williams Jack G.ORCID, Kincey Mark E., Benjamin Jessica, Bell Heather J. A.
Abstract
Abstract. Current methods to identify coseismic landslides immediately after an earthquake using optical imagery are too slow to effectively inform emergency response activities. Issues with cloud cover, data collection and processing, and manual landslide identification mean even the most rapid mapping exercises are often incomplete when the emergency response ends. In this study, we demonstrate how traditional empirical methods for modelling the total distribution and relative intensity (in terms of point density) of coseismic landsliding can be successfully undertaken in the hours and days immediately after an earthquake, allowing the results to effectively inform stakeholders during the response. The method uses fuzzy logic in a GIS (Geographic Information Systems) to quickly assess and identify the location-specific relationships between predisposing factors and landslide occurrence during the earthquake, based on small initial samples of identified landslides. We show that this approach can accurately model both the spatial pattern and the number density of landsliding from the event based on just several hundred mapped landslides, provided they have sufficiently wide spatial coverage, improving upon previous methods. This suggests that systematic high-fidelity mapping of landslides following an earthquake is not necessary for informing rapid modelling attempts. Instead, mapping should focus on rapid sampling from the entire affected area to generate results that can inform the modelling. This method is therefore suited to conditions in which imagery is affected by partial cloud cover or in which the total number of landslides is so large that mapping requires significant time to complete. The method therefore has the potential to provide a quick assessment of landslide hazard after an earthquake and may therefore inform emergency operations more effectively compared to current practice.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference53 articles.
1. Aleotti, P. and Chowdhury, R.: Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives, B. Eng. Geol. Environ., 58, 21–44, 1999. 2. Avouac, J. P., Meng, L., Wei, S., Wang, T., and Ampuero, J. P.: Lower edge of locked Main Himalayan Thrust unzipped by the 2015 Gorkha earthquake, Nat. Geosci., 8, 708–711, 2015. 3. Bettinelli, P., Avouac, J. P., Flouzat, M., Jouanne, F., Bollinger, L., Willis, P., and Chitrakar, G. R.: Plate motion of India and interseismic strain in the Nepal Himalaya from GPS and DORIS measurements, J. Geodesy., 80, 567–589, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0030-3, 2006. 4. Booth, A. M., Roering, J. J., and Perron, J. T.: Automated landslide mapping using spectral analysis and high-resolution topographic data: Puget Sound lowlands, Washington, and Portland Hills, Oregon, Geomorphology, 109, 132–147, 2009. 5. Borghuis, A. M., Chang, K., and Lee, H. Y.: Comparison between automated and manual mapping of typhoon-triggered landslides from SPOT-5 imagery, Int. J. Remote Sens., 28, 1843–1856, 2007.
Cited by
54 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|