Contribution of insurance data to cost assessment of coastal flood damage to residential buildings: insights gained from Johanna (2008) and Xynthia (2010) storm events
-
Published:2013-08-08
Issue:8
Volume:13
Page:2003-2012
-
ISSN:1684-9981
-
Container-title:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
André C.,Monfort D.,Bouzit M.,Vinchon C.
Abstract
Abstract. There are a number of methodological issues involved in assessing damage caused by natural hazards. The first is the lack of data, due to the rarity of events and the widely different circumstances in which they occur. Thus, historical data, albeit scarce, should not be neglected when seeking to build ex-ante risk management models. This article analyses the input of insurance data for two recent severe coastal storm events, to examine what causal relationships may exist between hazard characteristics and the level of damage incurred by residential buildings. To do so, data was collected at two levels: from lists of about 4000 damage records, 358 loss adjustment reports were consulted, constituting a detailed damage database. The results show that for flooded residential buildings, over 75% of reconstruction costs are associated with interior elements, with damage to structural components remaining very localised and negligible. Further analysis revealed a high scatter between costs and water depth, suggesting that uncertainty remains high in drawing up damage functions with insurance data alone. Due to the paper format of the loss adjustment reports, and the lack of harmonisation between their contents, the collection stage called for a considerable amount of work. For future events, establishing a standardised process for archiving damage information could significantly contribute to the production of such empirical damage functions. Nevertheless, complementary sources of data on hazards and asset vulnerability parameters will definitely still be necessary for damage modelling; multivariate approaches, crossing insurance data with external material, should also be investigated more deeply.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference26 articles.
1. APFM (Associated Programme on Flood Management): Conducting flood loss assessments – A tool for integrated flood management, Technical document no. 7, Flood management tools series, 30 pp., available at: http://www.apfm.info/?page_id=787 (last access: December 2012), 2007. 2. Bertin, X., Bruneau, N., Breilh, J.-F., Fortunato, A. B., and Karpytchev, M.: Importance of wave age and resonance in storm surges: The case Xynthia, Bay of Biscay, Ocean Model., 42 16–30, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2011.11.001, 2012. 3. Cariolet, J.-M., Costa, S., Caspar, R., Ardhuin, F., Magne, R., and Goasguen, G.: Atmospheric and marine aspects of the 10th of March 2008 storm in Atlantic and in the Channel, Norois, 215, 11–31, https://doi.org/10.4000/norois.3242, 2010 (in French). 4. Deboudt, P.: Towards coastal risk management in France, Ocean Coast. Manage., 53, 366–378, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.04.013, 2010. 5. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency): Hurricane Katrina in the Gulf Coast: Mitigation Assessment Team Report, Building Performance Observations, Recommendations, and Technical Guidance, FEMA 549, available at: http://www.fema.gov/resource-document-library (last access: December 2012), 2006.
Cited by
55 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|