An effective parameter optimization with radiation balance constraint in CAM5 (version 5.3)
-
Published:2020-01-03
Issue:1
Volume:13
Page:41-53
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Wu Li,Zhang Tao,Qin Yi,Xue Wei
Abstract
Abstract. Uncertain parameters in physical parameterizations of
general circulation models (GCMs) greatly impact model performance. In
recent years, automatic parameter optimization has been introduced for
tuning model performance of GCMs, but most of the optimization methods are
unconstrained optimization methods under a given performance indicator.
Therefore, the calibrated model may break through essential constraints that
models have to keep, such as the radiation balance at the top of the model. The
radiation balance is known for its importance in the conservation of model
energy. In this study, an automated and efficient parameter optimization
with the radiation balance constraint is presented and applied in the
Community Atmospheric Model (CAM5) in terms of a synthesized performance
metric using normalized mean square error of radiation, precipitation,
relative humidity, and temperature. The tuned parameters are from the
parameterization schemes of convection and cloud. The radiation constraint
is defined as the absolute difference of the net longwave flux at the top of the model (FLNT) and the net solar flux at the top of the model (FSNT) of less than 1 W m−2. Results show that the synthesized performance under the optimal
parameters is 6.3 % better than the control run (CNTL) and the
radiation imbalance is as low as 0.1 W m−2. The proposed method
provides an insight for physics-guided optimization, and it can be easily
applied to optimization problems with other prerequisite constraints in
GCMs.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference43 articles.
1. Adler, R. F., Huffman, G. J., Chang, A., Ferraro, R., Xie, P. P., Janowiak,
J., and Gruber, A.: The version-2 global precipitation climatology project
(GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979–present), J. Hydrol., 4,
1147–1167, 2003. 2. Bauer, P., Thorpe, A., and Brunet, G.: The quiet revolution of numerical
weather prediction, Nature, 525, 47–55, 2015. 3. Cameron, D., Beven, K. J., Tawn, J., Blazkova, S., and Naden, P.: Flood
frequency estimation by continuous simulation for a
gauged upland catchment (with uncertainty), J. Hydrol., 219, 169–187, 1999. 4. Cheng, G. H., Gjernes, T., and Wang, G. G.: An Adaptive Aggregation-Based
Approach for Expensively Constrained Black-Box Optimization Problems, J.
Mech. Design., 140, 091402, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040485, 2018. 5. Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P.,
Kobayashi, S., and Bechtold, P.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration
and performance of the data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
137, 553–597, 2011.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. A surrogate model-based ESM parameter tuning scientific workflow management framework for HPC;Earth Science Informatics;2024-09-04 2. Machine Learning-assisted Computational Steering of Large-scale Scientific Simulations;2021 IEEE Intl Conf on Parallel & Distributed Processing with Applications, Big Data & Cloud Computing, Sustainable Computing & Communications, Social Computing & Networking (ISPA/BDCloud/SocialCom/SustainCom);2021-09
|
|