Abstract
Abstract. Dynamic flux chambers (DFCs) and micrometeorological (MM) methods are extensively deployed for gauging air–surface Hg0 gas exchange. However, a systematic evaluation of the precision of the contemporary Hg0 flux quantification methods is not available. In this study, the uncertainty in Hg0 flux measured by relaxed eddy accumulation (REA) method, aerodynamic gradient method (AGM), modified Bowen-ratio (MBR) method, as well as DFC of traditional (TDFC) and novel (NDFC) designs is assessed using a robust data-set from two field intercomparison campaigns. The absolute precision in Hg0 concentration difference (Δ C) measurements is estimated at 0.064 ng m−3 for the gradient-based MBR and AGM system. For the REA system, the parameter is Hg0 concentration (C) dependent at 0.069+0.022C. 57 and 62% of the individual vertical gradient measurements were found to be significantly different from zero during the campaigns, while for the REA-technique the percentage of significant observations was lower. For the chambers, non-significant fluxes are confined to a few nighttime periods with varying ambient Hg0 concentration. Relative bias for DFC-derived fluxes is estimated to be ~ ±10%, and ~ 85% of the flux bias are within ±2 ng m−2 h−1 in absolute term. The DFC flux bias follows a diurnal cycle, which is largely dictated by temperature controls on the enclosed volume. Due to contrasting prevailing micrometeorological conditions, the relative uncertainty (median) in turbulent exchange parameters differs by nearly a factor of two between the campaigns, while that in Δ C measurements is fairly stable. The estimated flux uncertainties for the triad of MM-techniques are 16–27, 12–23 and 19–31% (interquartile range) for the AGM, MBR and REA method, respectively. This study indicates that flux-gradient based techniques (MBR and AGM) are preferable to REA in quantifying Hg0 flux over ecosystems with low vegetation height. A limitation of all Hg0 flux measurement systems investigated is their incapability to obtain synchronous samples for the calculation of Δ C. This reduces the precision of flux quantification, particularly the MM-systems under non-stationarity of ambient Hg0 concentration. For future applications, it is recommended to accomplish Δ C derivation from simultaneous collected samples.
Funder
Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
Reference72 articles.
1. Ammann, C.: On the Applicability of Relaxed Eddy Accumulation and Common Methods for Measuring Trace Gas Surface Fluxes, Ph.D. thesis, ETH, Zürich, 239 pp., 1998.
2. Ammann, C. and Meixner, F. X.: Stability dependence of the relaxed eddy accumulation coefficient for various scalar quantities, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, ACL7-1–ACL7-9, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000649, 2002.
3. Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D.: Eddy Covariance: a Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 2012.
4. Arnts, R. R., Mowry, F. L., and Hampton, G. A.: A high-frequency response relaxed eddy accumulation flux measurement system for sampling short-lived biogenic volatile organic compounds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 4860–4873, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50215, 2013.
5. Baker, J. M., Norman, J. M., and Bland, W. L.: Field-scale application of flux measurement by conditional sampling, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 62, 31–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(92)90004-N, 1992.