Abstract
Abstract. Skilful forecasts of high streamflows a month or more in advance are likely to be of considerable benefit to emergency services and the broader community. This is particularly true for mesoscale catchments (< 2000 km2) with little or no seasonal snowmelt, where real-time warning systems are only able to give short notice of impending floods. In this study, we generate forecasts of high streamflows for the coming 1-month and coming 3-month periods using large-scale ocean–atmosphere climate indices and catchment wetness as predictors. Forecasts are generated with a combination of Bayesian joint probability modelling and Bayesian model averaging. High streamflows are defined as maximum single-day streamflows and maximum 5-day streamflows that occur during each 1-month or 3-month forecast period. Skill is clearly evident in the 1-month forecasts of high streamflows. Surprisingly, in several catchments positive skill is also evident in forecasts of large threshold events (exceedance probabilities of 25%) over the next month. Little skill is evident in forecasts of high streamflows for the 3-month period. We show that including lagged climate indices as predictors adds little skill to the forecasts, and thus catchment wetness is by far the most important predictor. Accordingly, we recommend that forecasts may be improved by using accurate estimates of catchment wetness.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference53 articles.
1. Ashok, K., Guan, Z., and Yamagata, T.: Influence of the Indian Ocean dipole on the Australian winter rainfall, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1821, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017926, 2003.
2. Ashok, K., Nakamura, H., and Yamagata, T.: Impacts of ENSO and Indian Ocean dipole events on the southern hemisphere storm-track activity during austral winter, J. Climate, 20, 3147–3163, https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli4155.1, 2007.
3. Baxter-Tomkins, T. and Wallace, M.: Recruitment and retention of volunteers in emergency services, Australian Journal on Volunteering, 14, 1–11, 2009.
4. Benedetti, R.: Scoring rules for forecast verification, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 203–211, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR2945.1, 2010.
5. Brier, G. W.: Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability, Mon. Weather Rev., 78, 1–3, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.27.693.594, 1950.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献