Technical note: A refinement of coccolith separation methods: measuring the sinking characteristics of coccoliths
-
Published:2018-08-09
Issue:15
Volume:15
Page:4759-4775
-
ISSN:1726-4189
-
Container-title:Biogeosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biogeosciences
Author:
Zhang HongruiORCID, Stoll HeatherORCID, Bolton Clara, Jin XiaoboORCID, Liu Chuanlian
Abstract
Abstract. Quantification sinking velocities of individual coccoliths
will contribute to optimizing laboratory methods for separating coccoliths of
different sizes and species for geochemical analysis. The repeated
settling–decanting method was the earliest method proposed to separate
coccoliths from sediments and is still widely used. However, in the absence
of estimates of settling velocity for nonspherical coccoliths, previous
implementations have depended mainly on time-consuming empirical method
development by trial and error. In this study, the sinking velocities of
coccoliths belonging to different species were carefully measured in a series
of settling experiments for the first time. Settling velocities of modern
coccoliths range from 0.154 to 10.67 cm h−1. We found that a quadratic
relationship between coccolith length and sinking velocity fits well, and
coccolith sinking velocity can be estimated by measuring the coccolith length
and using the length–velocity factor, kv. We found a negligible
difference in sinking velocities measured in different vessels. However, an
appropriate choice of vessel must be made to avoid “hindered settling” in
coccolith separations. The experimental data and theoretical calculations
presented here support and improve the repeated settling–decanting method.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference38 articles.
1. Bach, L. T., Riebesell, U., Sett, S., Febiri, S., Rzepka, P., and Schulz, K. G.: An
approach for particle sinking velocity measurements in the 3–400 µm size
range and considerations on the effect of temperature on sinking rates, Mar.
Biol., 159, 1853–1864, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-012-1945-2, 2012. 2. Barnea, E. and Mizrahi, J.: A generalized approach to the fluid dynamics of
particulate systems: Part 1. General correlation for fluidization and
sedimentation in solid multiparticle systems, Chem. Eng.
J., 5, 171–189, https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9467(73)80008-5, 1973. 3. Baumann, K.-H.: Importance of size measurements for coccolith carbonate flux
estimates, Micropaleontology, 50, 35–43, 2004. 4. Beaufort, L., Lancelot, Y., Camberlin, P., Cayre, O., Vincent, E., Bassinot,
F., and Labeyrie, L.: Insolation cycles as a major control of equatorial Indian
Ocean primary production, Science, 278, 1451–1454,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.278.5342.1451, 1997. 5. Beltran, C., de Rafélis, M., Minoletti, F., Renard, M., Sicre, M. A.,
and Ezat, U.: Coccolith δ18O and alkenone records in middle Pliocene
orbitally controlled deposits: High-frequency temperature and salinity
variations of sea surface water, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 8,
Q05003, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001483, 2007.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|